Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Role of regional anesthesia and analgesia in enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Reasons for staying in hospital after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. AHA STEROID trial, dexamethasone in acute high-risk abdominal surgery, the protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Functional recovery after discharge in enhanced recovery video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a pilot prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Pre-operative autonomic nervous system function - a missing link for post-induction hypotension?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

  • Kariem El-Boghdadly
  • James M Jack
  • Aine Heaney
  • Nick D Black
  • Marina F Englesakis
  • Henrik Kehlet
  • Vincent W S Chan
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Effective analgesia is an important element of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), but the clinical impact of regional anesthesia and analgesia for colorectal surgery remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the impact of regional anesthesia following colorectal surgery in the setting of ERAS.

EVIDENCE REVIEW: We performed a systematic review of nine databases up to June 2020, seeking randomized controlled trials comparing regional anesthesia versus control in an ERAS pathway for colorectal surgery. We analyzed the studies with successful ERAS implementation, defined as ERAS protocols with a hospital length of stay of ≤5 days. Data were qualitatively synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.

FINDINGS: Of the 29 studies reporting ERAS pathways, only 13 comprising 1170 patients were included, with modest methodological quality and poor reporting of adherence to ERAS pathways. Epidural analgesia had limited evidence of outcome benefits in open surgery, while spinal analgesia with intrathecal opioids may potentially be associated with improved outcomes with no impact on length of stay in laparoscopic surgery, though dosing must be further investigated. There was limited evidence for fascial plane blocks or other regional anesthetic techniques.

CONCLUSIONS: Although there was variable methodological quality and reporting of ERAS, we found little evidence demonstrating the clinical benefits of regional anesthetic techniques in the setting of successful ERAS implementation, and future studies must report adherence to ERAS in order for their interventions to be generalizable to modern clinical practice.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020161200.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Vol/bind47
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)282-292
Antal sider11
ISSN1098-7339
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2022

Bibliografisk note

© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

ID: 75650909