TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma
T2 - consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group
AU - Barrington, Sally F
AU - Mikhaeel, N George
AU - Kostakoglu, Lale
AU - Meignan, Michel
AU - Hutchings, Martin
AU - Müeller, Stefan P
AU - Schwartz, Lawrence H
AU - Zucca, Emanuele
AU - Fisher, Richard I
AU - Trotman, Judith
AU - Hoekstra, Otto S
AU - Hicks, Rodney J
AU - O'Doherty, Michael J
AU - Hustinx, Roland
AU - Biggi, Alberto
AU - Cheson, Bruce D
PY - 2014/9/20
Y1 - 2014/9/20
N2 - PURPOSE: Recent advances in imaging, use of prognostic indices, and molecular profiling techniques have the potential to improve disease characterization and outcomes in lymphoma. International trials are under way to test image-based response–adapted treatment guided by early interim positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT). Progress in imaging is influencing trial design and affecting clinical practice. In particular, a five-point scale to grade response using PET-CT, which can be adapted to suit requirements for early- and late-response assessment with good interobserver agreement, is becoming widely used both in practice- and response-adapted trials. A workshop held at the 11th International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas (ICML) in 2011 concluded that revision to current staging and response criteria was timely.METHODS: An imaging working group composed of representatives from major international cooperative groups was asked to review the literature, share knowledge about research in progress, and identify key areas for research pertaining to imaging and lymphoma.RESULTS: A working paper was circulated for comment and presented at the Fourth International Workshop on PET in Lymphoma in Menton, France, and the 12th ICML in Lugano, Switzerland, to update the International Harmonisation Project guidance regarding PET. Recommendations were made to optimize the use of PET-CT in staging and response assessment of lymphoma, including qualitative and quantitative methods.CONCLUSION: This article comprises the consensus reached to update guidance on the use of PET-CT for staging and response assessment for [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lymphomas in clinical practice and late-phase trials.
AB - PURPOSE: Recent advances in imaging, use of prognostic indices, and molecular profiling techniques have the potential to improve disease characterization and outcomes in lymphoma. International trials are under way to test image-based response–adapted treatment guided by early interim positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT). Progress in imaging is influencing trial design and affecting clinical practice. In particular, a five-point scale to grade response using PET-CT, which can be adapted to suit requirements for early- and late-response assessment with good interobserver agreement, is becoming widely used both in practice- and response-adapted trials. A workshop held at the 11th International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas (ICML) in 2011 concluded that revision to current staging and response criteria was timely.METHODS: An imaging working group composed of representatives from major international cooperative groups was asked to review the literature, share knowledge about research in progress, and identify key areas for research pertaining to imaging and lymphoma.RESULTS: A working paper was circulated for comment and presented at the Fourth International Workshop on PET in Lymphoma in Menton, France, and the 12th ICML in Lugano, Switzerland, to update the International Harmonisation Project guidance regarding PET. Recommendations were made to optimize the use of PET-CT in staging and response assessment of lymphoma, including qualitative and quantitative methods.CONCLUSION: This article comprises the consensus reached to update guidance on the use of PET-CT for staging and response assessment for [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lymphomas in clinical practice and late-phase trials.
KW - Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
KW - Humans
KW - International Cooperation
KW - Lymphoma
KW - Neoplasm Staging
KW - Positron-Emission Tomography
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Prognosis
KW - Radiopharmaceuticals
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5229
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5229
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 25113771
VL - 32
SP - 3048
EP - 3058
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
SN - 0732-183X
IS - 27
ER -