Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

ROBOT-ASSISTED VITREORETINAL SURGERY IMPROVES SURGICAL ACCURACY COMPARED WITH MANUAL SURGERY: A Randomized Trial in a Simulated Setting

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROTON BEAM VERSUS PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY TO SPARE THE VISION IN CIRCUMSCRIBED CHOROIDAL HEMANGIOMA

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. GAS-FOVEAL CONTACT: A New Approach to Evaluating Positioning Regimens in Macular Hole Surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. SCLERAL PITS IN CHOROIDEREMIA: Implications for Retinal Gene Therapy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Reply to reply ( NONSUPINE POSITIONING IN MACULAR HOLE SURGERY: A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial.)

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  5. GUNN'S DOTS IN RETINAL IMAGES OF 2,286 ADOLESCENTS: Prevalence, Retinal Distribution and Associations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Measuring aniseikonia tolerance range for stereoacuity - a tool for the refractive surgeon

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Anesthesiologists’ airway management expertise: Identifying subjective and objective knowledge gaps

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: To compare manual and robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery using a virtual-reality surgical simulator.

METHODS: Randomized controlled crossover study. Ten experienced vitreoretinal surgeons and 10 novice ophthalmic surgeons were included. The participants were randomized to start with either manual or robot-assisted surgery. Participants completed a test session consisting of three vitreoretinal modules on the Eyesi virtual-reality simulator. The automated metrics of performance supplied by the Eyesi simulator were used as outcome measures. Primary outcome measures were time with instruments inserted (seconds), instrument movement (mm), and tissue treatment (mm).

RESULTS: Robot-assisted surgery was slower than manual surgery for both novices and vitreoretinal surgeons, 0.24 SD units (P = 0.024) and 0.73 SD units (P < 0.001), respectively. Robot-assisted surgery allowed for greater precision in novices and vitreoretinal surgeons, -0.96 SD units (P < 0.001) and -0.47 SD units (P < 0.001), respectively. Finally, novices using robot-assisted surgery inflicted less tissue damage when compared with that using manual surgery, -0.59 SD units (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION: At the cost of time, robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery seems to improve precision and limit tissue damage compared with that of manual surgery. In particular, the performance of novice surgeons is enhanced with robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
Vol/bind40
Udgave nummer11
Sider (fra-til)2091-2098
Antal sider8
ISSN0275-004X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2020

ID: 59301179