TY - JOUR
T1 - Robot-assisted gait training for individuals with severe acquired brain injury
T2 - a scoping review
AU - Wagner, Vibeke
AU - Rud Sørensen, Jakob
AU - Kruuse, Christina
AU - Poulsen, Ingrid
AU - Biering-Sørensen, Fin
AU - Riberholt, Christian Gunge
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Early out-of-bed mobilization is recommended for individuals with severe acquired brain injury and impaired consciousness to promote recovery. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) utilizes robotic assistance to facilitate neuroplastic changes through repetitive training and feedback. We aimed to map the evidence of RAGT in non-ambulatory individuals with impaired consciousness or cognitive functioning, focusing on the rationales underpinning its use and the assessment methods employed.METHOD: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA scoping review guidelines, we systematically searched for studies involving adults with severe acquired brain injury. Source selection, data extraction, and charting were performed in duplicate.RESULTS: Out of 10 444 records screened, seven were included, involving 162 participants. The studies included one randomized and two non-randomized clinical trials, two retrospective studies, and two case reports. RAGT aimed to improve physical recovery (n = 6), arousal stimulation (n = 4), and safety (n = 4). Twenty-six outcome measures were reported.CONCLUSION: Our review highlights a research gap in RAGT for individuals with severe brain injury and cognitive impairments. Specifically, the underlying rationales need investigation, and standardized outcome measures must be established. RAGT shows potential in improving functional recovery and consciousness, but future studies must address safety, and feasibility while navigating ethical challenges.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Early out-of-bed mobilization is recommended for individuals with severe acquired brain injury and impaired consciousness to promote recovery. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) utilizes robotic assistance to facilitate neuroplastic changes through repetitive training and feedback. We aimed to map the evidence of RAGT in non-ambulatory individuals with impaired consciousness or cognitive functioning, focusing on the rationales underpinning its use and the assessment methods employed.METHOD: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA scoping review guidelines, we systematically searched for studies involving adults with severe acquired brain injury. Source selection, data extraction, and charting were performed in duplicate.RESULTS: Out of 10 444 records screened, seven were included, involving 162 participants. The studies included one randomized and two non-randomized clinical trials, two retrospective studies, and two case reports. RAGT aimed to improve physical recovery (n = 6), arousal stimulation (n = 4), and safety (n = 4). Twenty-six outcome measures were reported.CONCLUSION: Our review highlights a research gap in RAGT for individuals with severe brain injury and cognitive impairments. Specifically, the underlying rationales need investigation, and standardized outcome measures must be established. RAGT shows potential in improving functional recovery and consciousness, but future studies must address safety, and feasibility while navigating ethical challenges.
KW - Brain Injuries/rehabilitation
KW - Exercise Therapy/methods
KW - Gait/physiology
KW - Humans
KW - Recovery of Function
KW - Robotics/methods
KW - disorders of consciousness
KW - rehabilitation technologies
KW - robot-assisted gait training
KW - stroke
KW - Brain injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105004352502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02699052.2025.2490285
DO - 10.1080/02699052.2025.2490285
M3 - Review
C2 - 40323792
SN - 0269-9052
VL - 39
SP - 809
EP - 819
JO - Brain Injury
JF - Brain Injury
IS - 10
ER -