Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Risk Factors for Dislocation and Re-revision After First-Time Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty due to Recurrent Dislocation: A Study From the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Drug-related challenges following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. E-vitamin giver nyt håb for den uopslidelige kunstige hofte

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelFormidling

Vis graf over relationer

Background: Persistent instability after hip revision is a serious problem. Our aim was to analyze surgical and patient-related risk factors for both a new dislocation and re-revision after first-time hip revision due to dislocation. Methods: We included patients with a primary THA due to osteoarthritis and a first-time revision due to dislocation registered in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR) from 1996 to 2016. We identified dislocations in the Danish National Patient Register and re-revisions in the DHR. Risk factors were analyzed by a multivariable regression analysis adjusting for the competing risk of death. Results are presented as subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR). Results: We identified 1678 first-time revisions due to dislocation. Of these, 22.4% had a new dislocation. 19.8% were re-revised for any reason. With new dislocations treated by closed reduction as the endpoint, the sHR was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.27-0.48) for those who had a constrained liner (CL) during revision and 0.21 (0.08-0.58) for dual mobility cups (DMC), thereby lowering the risk of dislocation compared to regular liners. Changing only the head/liner increased the risk of dislocation (sHR = 2.65; 2.05-3.42) compared to full cup revisions. The protective effect of CLs and DMCs on dislocations vanished when re-revisions became the endpoint. The head/liner exchange was still found inferior compared to cup revision (sHR = 1.73; 1.34-2.23). Conclusion: Patients revised with DMCs and CLs were associated with a lower risk of dislocation after a first-time revision but not re-revision, whereas only changing the head/liner was associated with a higher risk of dislocation and re-revision of any cause compared to cup revision.

TidsskriftJournal of Arthroplasty
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1407-1412
Antal sider6
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2021
Eksternt udgivetJa

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information: Funding and Conflicts of Interest: No other funding was associated with this study. There are no conflicts of interest to report. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Elsevier Inc. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

ID: 66047524