Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Risk Factors for and Prediction of a Difficult Neuraxial Block: A Cohort Study of 73,579 Patients from the Danish Anaesthesia Database

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. The PANSAID Randomized Clinical Trial: A pre-planned 1-year follow-up regarding harm

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Response

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The handling oxygenation targets in the intensive care unit (HOT-ICU) trial: Detailed statistical analysis plan

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Intraindividual variation of the transversus abdominis plane block: an exploratory study in healthy volunteers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: A difficult neuraxial block (DNB) may be associated with complications. The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of DNB, assess patient-related and organizational factors associated with DNB, and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an accumulated risk score for predicting DNB.

METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 73,579 patients was retrieved. A predefined DNB score and information on patient-related and organizational factors were included in the analyses. Logistic regression analysis was performed. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of an accumulated weighted point score of the patient-related risk factors of DNB.

RESULTS: The prevalence of DNB and abandoned neuraxial block was 3.9 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.7-4.0) and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.16-0.22), respectively. Body mass index of 35 or higher and previous DNB were associated with DNB, with 3.23 (95% CI, 2.87-3.65) and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.33-3.00), respectively. However, the remaining patient-related covariates were associated with DNB with substantial lower odds ratios. The diagnostic accuracy of an accumulated sum score demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.61-0.64), a positive predictive value of 5%, and a positive likelihood ratio of 1.4.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite of strong statistical association between DNB and the tested risk factors, the low odds ratios and estimates of the diagnostic test indicate that the clinical impact using an accumulated risk sum score is limited.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Vol/bind40
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)545-552
ISSN1098-7339
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 31 jul. 2015

ID: 45544121