Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Risk Factors for and Prediction of a Difficult Neuraxial Block: A Cohort Study of 73,579 Patients from the Danish Anaesthesia Database

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Local Anesthetic Injection Speed and Common Peroneal Nerve Block Duration: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Anesthesia and Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Where Is the Evidence?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  3. The Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Healthy Volunteers: A Reply to Dr Hebbard

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: A difficult neuraxial block (DNB) may be associated with complications. The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of DNB, assess patient-related and organizational factors associated with DNB, and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an accumulated risk score for predicting DNB.

METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 73,579 patients was retrieved. A predefined DNB score and information on patient-related and organizational factors were included in the analyses. Logistic regression analysis was performed. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of an accumulated weighted point score of the patient-related risk factors of DNB.

RESULTS: The prevalence of DNB and abandoned neuraxial block was 3.9 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.7-4.0) and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.16-0.22), respectively. Body mass index of 35 or higher and previous DNB were associated with DNB, with 3.23 (95% CI, 2.87-3.65) and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.33-3.00), respectively. However, the remaining patient-related covariates were associated with DNB with substantial lower odds ratios. The diagnostic accuracy of an accumulated sum score demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.61-0.64), a positive predictive value of 5%, and a positive likelihood ratio of 1.4.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite of strong statistical association between DNB and the tested risk factors, the low odds ratios and estimates of the diagnostic test indicate that the clinical impact using an accumulated risk sum score is limited.

TidsskriftRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)545-552
StatusUdgivet - 31 jul. 2015

ID: 45544121