Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Risk assessment models for potential use in the emergency department have lower predictive ability in older patients compared to the middle-aged for short-term mortality - a retrospective cohort study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Readmission of older acutely admitted medical patients after short term admission in Denmark - a nationwide cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The impact of retirement on age related cognitive decline - a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Prevalence and incidence of various Cancer subtypes in patients with heart failure vs matched controls

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Self-reported health status and the associated risk of mortality in heart failure: The DANISH trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Accelerated treatment of endocarditis-The POET II trial: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Charlson Comorbidity Index Score and Risk of Severe Outcome and Death in Danish COVID-19 Patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  5. Time from injury to arrival at the trauma centre in patients undergoing interhospital transfer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Background: Older patients is a complex group at increased risk of adverse outcomes compared to younger patients, which should be considered in the risk assessment performed in emergency departments. We evaluated whether the predictive ability of different risk assessment models for acutely admitted patients is affected by age. Methods: Cohort study of middle-Aged and older patients. We investigated the accuracy in discriminating between survivors and non-survivors within 7 days of different risk assessment models; a traditional triage algorithm, a triage algorithm with clinical assessment, vital signs, routine biomarkers, and the prognostic biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR). Results: The cohort included 22,653 (53.2%) middle-Aged patients (age 40-69 years), and 19,889 (46.8%) older patients (aged 70+ years). Death within 7 days occurred in 139 patients (0.6%) in middle-Aged patients and 596 (3.0%) of the older patients. The models based on vital signs and routine biomarkers had the highest area under the curve (AUC), and both were significantly better at discriminating 7-day mortality in middle-Aged patients compared to older patients; AUC (95% CI): 0.88 (0.84-0.91), 0.75 (0.72-0.78), P < 0.01, and 0.86 (0.82-0.90), 0.76 (0.73-0.78), P < 0.001. In a subgroup of the total cohort (6.400 patients, 15.0%), the suPAR level was available. suPAR had the highest AUC of all individual predictors with no significant difference between the age groups, but further research in this biomarker is required before it can be used. Conclusion: The predictive value was lower in older patients compared to middle-Aged patients for all investigated models. Vital signs or routine biomarkers constituted the best models for predicting 7-day mortality and were better than the traditional triage model. Hence, the current risk assessment for short-Term mortality can be strengthened, but modifications for age should be considered when constructing new risk assessment models in the emergency department.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer134
TidsskriftBMC Geriatrics
Vol/bind19
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)1-9
Antal sider9
ISSN1471-2318
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 16 maj 2019

ID: 57191955