Risiko for bias ved blindet versus ublindet vurdering af artikler i systematiske oversigtsartikler--en gennemgang af et Cochranereview

Abstract

A Cochrane review investigated the effect of blinding information of authors, institutions, journals and sponsorships in assessing the presence of bias in trials that were assessed for inclusion in a systematic review. Six randomized trials were included. The results of these were quite heterogeneous and from this review it is not possible to conclude anything about the effect of blinding with certainty. However, it proved time-consuming to implement a secure blinding and until further evidence appears, it is recommended to refrain from attempts to do so.
Bidragets oversatte titelRisk of bias by blinded vs unblinded evaluation of articles in systematic reviews
OriginalsprogDansk
TidsskriftUgeskrift for Laeger
Vol/bind175
Udgave nummer14
Sider (fra-til)951-4
Antal sider4
ISSN0041-5782
StatusUdgivet - 1 apr. 2013

Emneord

  • Humans
  • Publication Bias
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Review Literature as Topic
  • Risk

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Risiko for bias ved blindet versus ublindet vurdering af artikler i systematiske oversigtsartikler--en gennemgang af et Cochranereview'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater