Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

RIFD - A brief clinical research interview for functional somatic disorders and health anxiety

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. The unifying diagnostic construct of bodily distress syndrome (BDS) was confirmed in the general population

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Do patients with ICD who report anxiety symptoms on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale suffer from anxiety?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Longing for existential recognition : A qualitative study of everyday concerns for people with severe somatoform disorders

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt i tidsskriftForskningpeer review

  1. The unifying diagnostic construct of bodily distress syndrome (BDS) was confirmed in the general population

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Changes in subtypes of overt thyrotoxicosis and hypothyroidism following iodine fortification

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Determinants for symptomatic gallstone disease readmissions - results from a cohort with screen-detected gallstone disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological research in functional somatic disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and bodily distress syndrome and related conditions such as health (illness) anxiety is often based on self-reported questionnaires or layman interviews. This study presents and describes the Research Interview for Functional somatic Disorders (RIFD) and provides first data regarding RIFD's ability to identify cases with functional somatic disorders and health anxiety in a two-phase design following self-reported symptom questionnaires.

METHODS: RIFD was performed by phone by trained family physicians on a stratified subsample of 1590 adults from a Danish general population cohort (n = 7493). Criterion validity was tested in a small preliminary test including 25 RIFD participants using Schedules of Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), performed by a specialist in functional somatic disorders, as gold standard. Interrater reliability between interviewers was tested in 15 participants.

RESULTS: Compared with the comprehensive SCAN, preparation and conduction of RIFD were feasible and prompt. RIFD was well accepted by both interviewers and interviewees. RIFD identified cases with significantly more impairment than identified non-cases. Based on small preliminary tests, RIFD showed promising psychometric properties.

CONCLUSION: RIFD was a feasible, well-accepted and promising instrument for use in large epidemiological studies. However, larger studies investigating its psychometric properties are needed.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Vol/bind122
Sider (fra-til)104-111
Antal sider8
ISSN0022-3999
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ID: 56976689