Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Responsiveness of clinical tests for people with neck pain

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Bone shortening of clavicular fractures: comparison of measurement methods

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Infographic. Therapeutic exercise relieves pain and does not harm knee cartilage nor trigger inflammation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Knee osteoarthritis risk is increased 4-6 fold after knee injury - a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. When enough is enough - How to determine when the evidence for the effectiveness of a treatment is sufficient?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Infographic. Exercise therapy for meniscal tears: evidence and recommendations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  • René Jørgensen
  • Inge Ris
  • Carsten Juhl
  • Deborah Falla
  • Birgit Juul-Kristensen
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Responsiveness of a clinical test is highly relevant in order to evaluate the effect of a given intervention. However, the responsiveness of clinical tests for people with neck pain has not been adequately evaluated. The objective of the present study was to examine the responsiveness of four clinical tests which are low cost and easy to perform in a clinical setting, including the craniocervical flexion test, cervical active range of movement, test for the cervical extensors and pressure pain threshold testing.

METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of data collected in a previously published randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomized to either physical training, exercises and pain education combined or pain education only. Participants were tested on the clinical tests at baseline and at 4-month follow-up. An anchor-based approach using Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) curves was used to evaluate responsiveness of the clinical tests. The Neck Disability Index was used to discriminate between those who had improved and those who were unchanged at the 4-month follow-up. Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID), together with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, in addition to positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated.

RESULTS: In total, 164 participants completed the 4 month follow up. One-hundred forty four participants were classified as unchanged whereas 20 patients were considered to be improved. Twenty-six participants didn't complete all of the clinical tests, leaving a total of 138 to be included for analyses. Area Under Curve (AUC) ranged from 0.50-0.62 for the clinical tests, and were all below an acceptable level. MCID was generally large, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity was low with sensitivity ranging from 20 to 60%, and specificity from 54 to 86%. LR+ (0.8-2.07) and LR- (0.7-1.1) showed low diagnostic value for all variables, with PPV ranging from 12.1 to 26.1 and NPV ranging from 84.7 to 89.2.

CONCLUSION: Responsiveness of the included clinical tests was generally low when using change in NDI score as the anchor from baseline to the 4-month follow up. Further investigations of responsiveness are warranted, possibly using other anchors, which to a higher degree resemble similar dimensions as the clinical tests.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Vol/bind18
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)548
ISSN1471-2474
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 28 dec. 2017

ID: 52352793