Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Responsiveness, minimal important difference, minimal relevant difference, and optimal number of patients for a study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Response to Letter-to-Editor by Lixandrão et al. published in Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 31(2), 489-492, 2021

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  2. One year of Football Fitness improves L1-L4 BMD, postural balance and muscle strength in women treated for breast cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Self-rated physical fitness and measured cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, and body composition

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Should leisure time sedentary behaviour be replaced with sleep or physical activity for prevention of diabetes?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Collagens in primary frozen shoulder: expression of collagen mRNA isoforms in the different phases of the disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Functional muscle synergies to support the knee against moment specific loads while weight bearing

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. No detectable remodelling in adult human menisci: an analysis based on the C14 bomb pulse

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Several terms are used to describe changes in PROM scores in relation to treatments. Whether the change is small, large, or relevant is defined in different ways, yet these change scores are used to recommend or oppose treatments. They are also used to calculate the necessary number of patients for a study. This article offers a theoretical explanation behind the terms responsiveness, minimal important difference (MID), minimal important change (MIC), minimal relevant difference (MIREDIF), and threshold of clinical importance. It also gives instructions on how these and the optimal number of patients for a study are calculated. Responses to two domains of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), before and 1 year after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of 164 patients, are used to illustrate the calculations. This paper presents the most common methods used to calculate and interpret MID. Results vary substantially across domains, patient location on the scale, and health conditions. The optimal number of patients depends on the minimal relevant difference (MIREDIF), the standard error of the measure (SEM), the desired statistical power for the measurement, and the responsiveness of the measurement instrument (the PROM). There is often uncertainty surrounding the calculation and interpretation of responsiveness, MID, and MIREDIF, as these concepts are complex. When MID is used to evaluate research results, authors should specify how the MID was calculated, and its relevance for the study population. These measures should only be used after thorough consideration to justify healthcare decisions.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
ISSN0905-7188
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 15 okt. 2020

Bibliografisk note

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 62410896