Response to Rucaparib in BRCA-Mutant Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Identified by Genomic Testing in the TRITON2 Study

Andrea Loehr, Akash Patnaik, David Campbell, Jeremy Shapiro, Alan H Bryce, Ray McDermott, Brieuc Sautois, Nicholas J Vogelzang, Richard M Bambury, Eric Voog, Jingsong Zhang, Josep M Piulats, Arif Hussain, Charles J Ryan, Axel S Merseburger, Gedske Daugaard, Axel Heidenreich, Karim Fizazi, Celestia S Higano, Laurence E KriegerCora N Sternberg, Simon P Watkins, Darrin Despain, Andrew D Simmons, Melanie Dowson, Tony Golsorkhi, Simon Chowdhury, Wassim Abida

17 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: The PARP inhibitor rucaparib is approved in the United States for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and a deleterious germline and/or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alteration. While sequencing of tumor tissue is considered the standard for identifying patients with BRCA alterations (BRCA+), plasma profiling may provide a minimally invasive option to select patients for rucaparib treatment. Here, we report clinical efficacy in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC identified through central plasma, central tissue, or local genomic testing and enrolled in TRITON2.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had progressed after next-generation androgen receptor-directed and taxane-based therapies for mCRPC and had BRCA alterations identified by central sequencing of plasma and/or tissue samples or local genomic testing. Concordance of plasma/tissue BRCA status and objective response rate and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates were summarized.

RESULTS: TRITON2 enrolled 115 patients with BRCA+ identified by central plasma (n = 34), central tissue (n = 37), or local (n = 44) testing. Plasma/tissue concordance was determined in 38 patients with paired samples and was 47% in 19 patients with a somatic BRCA alteration. No statistically significant differences were observed between objective and PSA response rates to rucaparib across the 3 assay groups. Patients unable to provide tissue samples and tested solely by plasma assay responded at rates no different from patients identified as BRCA+ by tissue testing.

CONCLUSIONS: Plasma, tissue, and local testing of mCRPC patients can be used to identify men with BRCA+ mCRPC who can benefit from treatment with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftClinical Cancer Research
Vol/bind27
Udgave nummer24
Sider (fra-til)6677-6686
Antal sider10
ISSN1078-0432
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 15 dec. 2021

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Response to Rucaparib in BRCA-Mutant Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Identified by Genomic Testing in the TRITON2 Study'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater