Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Repeated Treatments with Ingenol Mebutate Prevents Progression of UV-Induced Photodamage in Hairless Mice

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Novel functions of the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor in prostate cancer cells and patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Hepatitis C prevalence in Denmark in 2016-An updated estimate using multiple national registers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Inflammation, non-endothelial dependent coronary microvascular function and diastolic function-Are they linked?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Lipidomics of human adipose tissue reveals diversity between body areas

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis. In this study, we hypothesized that repeated treatments with IngMeb may prevent progression of UV-induced photodamage, and that concurrent application of a corticosteroid may reduce IngMeb-induced local skin responses (LSR).

METHODS: Hairless mice (n = 60; 3 groups of 20 mice) were irradiated with solar simulated ultraviolet radiation (UVR) throughout the study. Five single treatments with IngMeb were given at 4-week intervals (Days 21, 49, 77, 105, and 133). Clobetasol propionate (CP) was applied once daily for 5 days prior to each IngMeb application, as well as 6 h and 1 day post treatment. One week after IngMeb treatment No. 1, 3, and 5 (Days 28, 84, and 140), biopsies from four mice in each group were collected for histological evaluation of UV-damage on a standardized UV-damage scale (0-12). LSR (0-24) were assessed once daily (Days 1-7) after each IngMeb treatment.

RESULTS: IngMeb prevented progression of photodamage in terms of keratosis grade, epidermal hypertrophy, dysplasia, and dermal actinic damage with a lower composite UV-damage score on day 140 (UVR 10.25 vs. UVR+IngMeb 6.00, p = 0.002) compared to UVR alone. IngMeb induced LSR, including erythema, flaking, crusting, bleeding, vesiculation, and ulceration. Concurrent CP increased LSR (max LSR Tx 1-5: UVR+IngMeb+CP 3.6-5.5 vs. UVR+IngMeb 2.6-4.3) and provided better prevention of photodamage compared to IngMeb alone (Day 140: UVR+IngMeb 6.00 vs. UVR+IngMeb+CP 3.00 p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Repeated field-directed treatments with IngMeb prevent progression of cutaneous photodamage in hairless mice, while CP cannot be used to alleviate IngMeb-induced LSR. The findings suggest that IngMeb may potentially serve as a prophylactic treatment for UV-induced tumors.

TidsskriftP L o S One
Udgave nummer9
Sider (fra-til)e0162597
StatusUdgivet - 2016

ID: 49761853