Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Use of Sports Hernia to Describe Groin Pain in Athletes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Incidence and Prognosis of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Reoperation rates for laparoscopic vs open repair of femoral hernias in Denmark: a nationwide analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Breast cancer mortality and overdiagnosis after implementation of population-based screening in Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Breast cancer survival in Nordic BRCA2 mutation carriers-unconventional association with oestrogen receptor status

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Induction of PIK3CA alterations during neoadjuvant letrozole may improve outcome in postmenopausal breast cancer patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. The accuracy of titanium contrast-enhanced mammography: a retrospective multicentric study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Importance: New techniques for preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions may decrease the reoperation rate in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with rates after surgery with the standard wire-guided localization. However, a valid reoperation rate for this procedure needs to be established for comparison, as previous studies on this procedure include a variety of malignant and benign breast lesions.

Objectives: To determine the reoperation rate after wire-guided BCS in patients with histologically verified nonpalpable invasive breast cancer (IBC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to examine whether the risk of reoperation is associated with DCIS or histologic type of the IBC.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide study including women with histologically verified IBC or DCIS having wire-guided BCS performed between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013, used data from the Danish National Patient Registry that were cross-checked with the Danish Breast Cancer Group database and the Danish Pathology Register.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Reoperation rate after wire-guided BCS in patients with IBC or DCIS.

Results: Wire-guided BCS was performed in 4118 women (mean [SD] age, 60.9 [8.7] years). A total of 725 patients (17.6%) underwent a reoperation: 593 were reexcisions (14.4%) and 132 were mastectomies (3.2%). Significantly more patients with DCIS (271 of 727 [37.3%]) than with IBC (454 of 3391 [13.4%]) underwent a reoperation (adjusted odds ratio, 3.82; 95% CI, 3.19-4.58; P < .001). After the first reexcision, positive margins were still present in 97 patients (16.4%). The risk of repeated positive margins was significantly higher in patients with DCIS vs those with IBC (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.42-3.43; P < .001). The risk of reoperation was significantly increased in patients with lobular carcinoma vs those with ductal carcinoma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.44; 95% CI 1.06-1.95; P = .02). A total of 202 patients (4.9%) had a subsequent completion mastectomy, but no difference was found in the type of reoperation between patients with DCIS and those with IBC.

Conclusions and Relevance: A lower reoperation rate after wire-guided BCS was found in this study than those shown in previous studies. However, the risk of reoperation in patients with DCIS was 3 times higher than in those with IBC. The widespread use of mammographic screening will increase the number of patients diagnosed with DCIS, making a precise localization of nonpalpable DCIS lesions even more important.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJAMA Surgery
Vol/bind152
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)378-384
ISSN2168-6254
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

ID: 49687611