Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Reliability validity and responsiveness of the spinal cord independence measure 4th version in a multicultural setup

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Differences in Acute Metabolic Responses to Bionic and Nonbionic Ambulation in Spinal Cord Injured Humans and Controls

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The Association between Social Engagement, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Falls among Older Primary Care Patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Harmonization of Databases: A Step for Advancing the Knowledge About Spinal Cord Injury

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Case series on the Charcot neuroarthropathy in hands after cervical central cord syndrome

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Community dwelling life- and health issues among persons living with chronic spinal cord injury in North Macedonia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. An observational study on body mass index during rehabilitation and follow-up in people with spinal cord injury in Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Forløsning af og bedøvelse til fødende kvinder med medfødte ryganomalier

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  • Amiram Catz
  • Malka Itzkovich
  • Keren Elkayam
  • Dianne Michaeli
  • Ilana Gelernter
  • Yoav Benjamini
  • Harvinder Singh Chhabra
  • Luigi Tesio
  • Einat Engel-Haber
  • Emiliana Bizzarini
  • Claudio Pilati
  • Giulio Del Popolo
  • Ilaria Baroncini
  • Nan Liu
  • Paulo Margalho
  • Thabata Pasquini Soeira
  • Bobeena Chandy
  • Mrinal Joshi
  • Jean-Francois Lemay
  • Dorothyann Curran
  • Annelie Schedin Leiulfsrud
  • Linda Sørensen
  • Fin Biering-Sorensen
  • Nur Kesiktas
  • Aheed Osman
  • Vadim Bluvshtein
Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: To examine the fourth version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure for reliability and validity.

DESIGN: Partly blinded comparison with the criterion standard Spinal Cord Independence Measure III, and between examiners and examinations.

SETTING: A multicultural cohort from 19 spinal cord injury units in 11 countries.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 648 patients with spinal cord injury.

INTERVENTION: Assessment with Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM IV) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) on admission to inpatient rehabilitation and before discharge.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SCIM IV interrater reliability, internal consistency, correlation with and difference from SCIM III, and responsiveness.

RESULTS: Total agreement between examiners was above 80% on most SCIM IV tasks. All Kappa coefficients were above 0.70 and statistically significant (P<.001). Pearson's coefficients of the correlation between the examiners were above 0.90, and intraclass correlation coefficients were above 0.90. Cronbach's alpha was above 0.96 for the entire SCIM IV, above 0.66 for the subscales, and usually decreased when an item was eliminated. Reliability values were lower for the subscale of respiration and sphincter management, and on admission than at discharge. SCIM IV and SCIM III mean values were very close, and the coefficients of Pearson correlation between them were 0.91-0.96 (P<.001). The responsiveness of SCIM IV was not significantly different from that of SCIM III in most of the comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS: The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SCIM IV, which was adjusted to assess specific patient conditions or situations that SCIM III does not address, and which includes more accurate definitions of certain scoring criteria, are very good and quite similar to those of SCIM III. SCIM IV can be used for clinical and research trials, including international multi-center studies, and its group scores can be compared with those of SCIM III.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Vol/bind103
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)430-440.e1
ISSN0003-9993
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2022

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

ID: 69208556