Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Recurrent rearrangements of the PLAG1 and HMGA2 genes in lacrimal gland pleomorphic adenoma and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Monocular and binocular end-points after epiretinal membrane surgery and their correlation to patient-reported outcomes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The tolerance of anisometropia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Periocular necrotizing soft tissue infection in Greater Copenhagen

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. The molecular profile of mucosal melanoma

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Lymphoma of the Lacrimal Gland - An International Multicenter Retrospective Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Management of Ocular Manifestations of Atopic Dermatitis: A Consensus Meeting Using a Modified Delphi Process

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Ocular adnexal lymphoma in Denmark: a nationwide study of 387 cases from 1980 to 2017

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Genetic Biomarkers in Melanoma of the Ocular Region: What the Medical Oncologist Should Know

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: Lacrimal gland tumours constitute a wide spectrum of neoplastic lesions that are histologically similar to tumours of the salivary gland. In the salivary gland, pleomorphic adenoma (PA) is frequently characterized by recurrent chromosomal rearrangements of the PLAG1 and HMGA2 genes, a genetic feature retained in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (ca-ex-PA) that makes it possible to distinguish ca-ex-PA from de novo carcinomas. However, whether PLAG1 and HMGA2 gene rearrangements are found in lacrimal gland PA and ca-ex-PA is not known.

METHODS: Twenty-one lacrimal gland PAs and four ca-ex-PAs were retrospectively reviewed and subjected to break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rearrangements of the PLAG1 gene. Cases without PLAG1 abnormalities were subjected to HMGA2 break-apart FISH. Immunohistochemical staining for PLAG1 and HMGA2 protein was performed and correlated with gene status.

RESULTS: Sixteen of 21 PAs showed rearrangement of PLAG1 and were all positive for PLAG1 protein. Two of the remaining five PAs showed rearrangement of HMGA2 and were the only cases positive for HMGA2 with immunohistochemistry. The three FISH-negative PAs expressed PLAG1 protein. All four ca-ex-PAs showed rearrangement of PLAG1 and expressed PLAG1 protein. None of the de novo carcinomas showed rearrangement of either of the two genes or expression of the two proteins.

CONCLUSION: Rearrangement of PLAG1 and HMGA2 and expression of the corresponding proteins are frequent and specific findings in lacrimal gland PA and ca-ex-PA. The mechanism for PLAG1 overexpression in FISH-negative PAs is yet to be clarified.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Ophthalmologica
Vol/bind96
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)e768-e771
ISSN1755-375X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2018

ID: 56469943