TY - JOUR
T1 - Recommended standard of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
T2 - a consensus statement
AU - Freedman, Mark S
AU - Thompson, Edward J
AU - Deisenhammer, Florian
AU - Giovannoni, Gavin
AU - Grimsley, Guy
AU - Keir, Geoffrey
AU - Ohman, Sten
AU - Racke, Michael K
AU - Sharief, Mohammad
AU - Sindic, Christian J M
AU - Sellebjerg, Finn
AU - Tourtellotte, Wallace W
PY - 2005/6
Y1 - 2005/6
N2 - New criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) were published as the result of an internationally formed committee. To increase the specificity of diagnosis and to minimize the number of false diagnoses, the committee recommended the use of both clinical and paraclinical criteria, the latter involving information obtained from magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Although rigorous magnetic resonance imaging requirements were provided, the "new criteria paper" fell short in terms of guidelines as to how the CSF analysis should be performed and simply equated the IgG index with isoelectric focusing, without any justification. The spectrum of parameters analyzed and methods for CSF analysis differ worldwide and often yield variable results in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reliability, with no decided "optimal" CSF test for the diagnosis of MS. To address this question specifically, an international panel of experts in MS and CSF diagnostic techniques was convened and the result was this article, representing a consensus of all the participants. These recommendations for establishing a standard for the evaluation of CSF in patients suspected of having MS should greatly complement the new criteria in ensuring that a correct diagnosis of MS is being made.
AB - New criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) were published as the result of an internationally formed committee. To increase the specificity of diagnosis and to minimize the number of false diagnoses, the committee recommended the use of both clinical and paraclinical criteria, the latter involving information obtained from magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Although rigorous magnetic resonance imaging requirements were provided, the "new criteria paper" fell short in terms of guidelines as to how the CSF analysis should be performed and simply equated the IgG index with isoelectric focusing, without any justification. The spectrum of parameters analyzed and methods for CSF analysis differ worldwide and often yield variable results in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reliability, with no decided "optimal" CSF test for the diagnosis of MS. To address this question specifically, an international panel of experts in MS and CSF diagnostic techniques was convened and the result was this article, representing a consensus of all the participants. These recommendations for establishing a standard for the evaluation of CSF in patients suspected of having MS should greatly complement the new criteria in ensuring that a correct diagnosis of MS is being made.
KW - Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
KW - Humans
KW - Immunoglobulin G/cerebrospinal fluid
KW - Multiple Sclerosis/cerebrospinal fluid
U2 - 10.1001/archneur.62.6.865
DO - 10.1001/archneur.62.6.865
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 15956157
SN - 0003-9942
VL - 62
SP - 865
EP - 870
JO - Archives of Neurology
JF - Archives of Neurology
IS - 6
ER -