Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Recommendations on thromboprophylaxis in major joint arthroplasty - many guidelines, little consensus?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Plasma levels of mannose-binding lectin and future risk of venous thromboembolism

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Towards patient-specific management of trauma hemorrhage: the effect of resuscitation therapy on parameters of thromboelastometry

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Filaggrin loss-of-function mutations as risk factors for ischemic stroke in the general population

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Association of ficolin-3 with abdominal aortic aneurysm presence and progression

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Days alive and out of hospital after fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty: an observational cohort study in 16 137 patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. A national center for persistent severe pain after groin hernia repair: Five-year prospective data

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Venous thromboembolic events remain a concern in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Consequently, several guidelines on thromboprophylaxis have been established. However, despite similarities in methodology for evaluation of evidence, discrepancies in guideline recommendations continue to exist. Furthermore, the results of older randomized clinical trials still have significant influence despite major improvements in perioperative care. In contrast, the results of recent large cohort studies with fewer thromboembolic events are mostly used only for background data. Here we outline some of the differences between the guidelines on thromboprophylaxis from the American College of Chest Physicians, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. We discuss differences in the methodology and focus of the guidelines potentially influencing the final recommendations. Future analyses are required, including data from modern care with early mobilisation and short length of stay. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH
Vol/bind17
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)250-253
Antal sider4
ISSN1538-7933
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

ID: 55840716