Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Randomized trial to examine procedure-to-procedure transfer in laparoscopic simulator training

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Perioperative care guidelines: conflicts and controversies

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  2. Differential recurrence after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: importance of a nationwide registry-based mesh surveillance

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Response to: Meticulous surgical technique cannot be replaced by cholangiography

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Fluorescence or X-ray cholangiography in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic simulation has become a standard component of surgical training, but there is limited knowledge regarding skills transfer between procedural tasks. The objective was to investigate the specificity of procedural simulator training.

METHODS: This was randomized single-centre educational superiority trial. Surgical novices practised basic skills on a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator. On reaching proficiency, participants were randomized to proficiency-based training. The intervention group practised two procedures on the simulator (appendicectomy followed by salpingectomy), whereas the control group trained on only one procedure (salpingectomy). The main outcomes were number of repetitions and time to proficiency for the second procedure.

RESULTS: Ninety-six participants were randomized, of whom 74 per cent were women, with a median age of 26 years. The intervention group needed significantly fewer attempts than the control group to reach proficiency in the second procedure: median (i.q.r.) 22 (17-34) versus 32 (26-41) attempts, which corresponded to 24·1 per cent fewer attempts as assessed by multivariable analysis (P = 0·004). The intervention group required significantly less time than the control group to reach proficiency: median (i.q.r.) 88 (63-127) versus 131 (101-153) min respectively, corresponding to a difference of 31·1 min as assessed by multivariable analysis (P = 0·001).

CONCLUSION: Practising two procedures, compared with only one, reduced the number of attempts and time to reach proficiency in the second procedure. Skills transfer is seen between two tasks in laparoscopic simulator training; however, task specificity is still present when practising procedures.

REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02069951 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe British journal of surgery
Vol/bind103
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)44-50
Antal sider7
ISSN0007-1323
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2016

ID: 46255689