Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Randomized double blind clinical trial of ABM/P-15 versus allograft in non-instrumented lumbar fusion surgery

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Dokumenter

DOI

  1. Revision risk after pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a nationwide study with 2-year follow-up

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Five-year patient reported outcomes ABM/P-15 versus allograft in non-instrumented posterolateral fusion

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt i tidsskriftForskningpeer review

  3. Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Outcomes following discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in patients with substantial back pain

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt i tidsskriftForskningpeer review

  1. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications following primary total knee arthroplasty: a Danish nationwide cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Drug-related challenges following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Michael Kjær Jacobsen
  • Andreas Duch Killerich Andresen
  • Annette Bennedsgaard Jespersen
  • Christian Støttrup
  • Leah Y Carreon
  • Soren Overgaard
  • Mikkel Østerheden Andersen
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Due to poor bone stock in the elderly, a noninstrumented fusion is commonly performed in Scandinavia when instability is present. Allograft bone is often used as graft extender with consequent low fusion rates. The use of 15 amino acid residue (ABM/P-15) has shown superior fusion rates in dental and cervical spinal surgery but no clinical studies have been conducted in noninstrumented lumbar fusion surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient reported outcomes (PROs) and the intertransverse fusion rate in noninstrumented posterolateral fusion with either ABM/P-15 or allograft.

STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind randomized clinical trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients 60 years or older with degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing decompression and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analog scales for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index and EuroQoL-5D.

METHODS: One hundred one patients were enrolled in the study and randomized 1:1 to either ABM/P-15 (mixed 50/50, 5cc/level) or allograft bone (30 g/level), both mixed with local bone graft. PROs were collected at baseline and at 12 and 24 months after surgery. The patients underwent 1-year postoperative fine cut computed tomography-scans (0.9 mm) with reconstructions, independently evaluated by three reviewers. Fusion status was concluded by consensus of two of the three as "fusion" or "no fusion."

RESULTS: There were 49 patients available for analysis in both cohorts. The two groups were similar in terms of sex distribution, age, and number of levels fused. The fusion rate was significantly higher in the ABM/P-15 group with 50% fused compared with 20% in the allograft group. PROs at baseline and at all follow-up time points were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing noninstrumented posterolateral fusion augmented with ABM/P-15 had a statistically significantly higher fusion rate compared with allograft when evaluated with postoperative fine cut computed tomography-scans (0.9 mm) with reconstructions. However, this did not translate to better clinical outcomes.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe Spine Journal
Vol/bind20
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)677-684
ISSN1529-9430
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2020
Eksternt udgivetJa

ID: 66052981