Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Percutaneous interventional therapies, such as radiofrequency (thermal) ablation (RFA), have been developed for early hepatocellular carcinoma. RFA competes with other interventional techniques such as percutaneous ethanol injection, surgical resection, and liver transplantation. The potential benefits and harms of RFA compared with placebo, no intervention, chemotherapy, hepatic resection, liver transplantation, or other interventions are unclear.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
| Vol/bind | 12 |
| Sider (fra-til) | CD003046 |
| ISSN | 1469-493X |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2013 |
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Citationsformater
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS