Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma

Sebastian Weis, Annegret Franke, Joachim Mössner, Janus C Jakobsen, Konrad Schoppmeyer

97 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Percutaneous interventional therapies, such as radiofrequency (thermal) ablation (RFA), have been developed for early hepatocellular carcinoma. RFA competes with other interventional techniques such as percutaneous ethanol injection, surgical resection, and liver transplantation. The potential benefits and harms of RFA compared with placebo, no intervention, chemotherapy, hepatic resection, liver transplantation, or other interventions are unclear.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Vol/bind12
Sider (fra-til)CD003046
ISSN1469-493X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater