Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Racial and Sociodemographic Differences of Semen Parameters Among US Men Undergoing a Semen Analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. DaBlaCa-11: Photodynamic Diagnosis in Flexible Cystoscopy-A Randomized Study With Focus on Recurrence

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Where Do Transrectal Ultrasound- and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies Miss Significant Prostate Cancer?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Renal Branch Artery Stenosis: A Diagnostic Challenge? A Case Report With Review of the Literature

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. Urinary Tract Cancer in Lynch Syndrome; Increased Risk in Carriers of MSH2 Mutations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Influence of errors in job codes on job exposure matrix-based exposure assessment in the register-based occupational cohort DOC*X

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Atopic dermatitis is associated with increased use of social benefits: a register-based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: To characterize sociodemographic differences in semen parameters among US men undergoing a semen analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men who provided a semen sample were identified from insurance claims between 2007 and 2016. Differences in semen parameters were characterized according to age, race, education, and region. Mean semen parameters and proportions of men with suboptimal parameters were compared and risks of oligospermia and azoospermia were assessed by logistic regression.

RESULTS: Of the 7263 men included, most men were white (55.1%), Hispanic (20.2%), or Asian (10.2%). Asians had the highest mean semen concentrations (69.2 × 106/mL), whereas blacks had the lowest (51.3 × 106/mL). Men from the Midwest were more likely to have oligospermia (odds ratio [OR] 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-1.94), whereas men from the West were less likely (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.82-0.94) when compared with men from South. An association between education and sperm concentration was observed. For example, men with a high school diploma or less were more likely to have oligospermia (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.95-1.26), whereas men with at least a bachelor degree were less likely (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76-1.0) when compared with men with less than a bachelor degree.

CONCLUSION: As we observed differences in semen quality based on sociodemographic factors, these findings may have clinical implications as relying on a single reference value when guiding infertile couples may be problematic given these variations. Further work is warranted to understand the etiology of such differences and determine if different normative reference values may apply for different populations.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftUrology
Vol/bind123
Sider (fra-til)126-132
Antal sider7
ISSN0090-4295
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2019

ID: 56646411