Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Erectile Dysfunction

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Sexual Health and Dysfunction in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-sectional Single-Center Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Compromised Sexual Health Among Male Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Sexual Health During Postgraduate Training-European Survey Across Medical Specialties

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Evaluation of a re-engineered device for penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Udredning og behandling af mandlig infertilitet

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. A model for digital innovations in sexual medicine

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  • EAU YAU Men's Health Working Group
Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: Many patients seek information online including on social media.

AIM: To assess the quality of information regarding erectile dysfunction (ED) in YouTube videos.

METHODS: We searched "erectile dysfunction" on YouTube in October 2019 and evaluated the first 100 videos in English sorted by relevance.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We recorded the user engagement, video producer, intended audience, and content. Videos containing medical information were evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and the DISCERN quality criteria for consumer health information. The PEMAT evaluates the understandability and actionability of materials as a percentage. The DISCERN assesses the quality of information by a scale from 1 (serious or extensive shortcomings) to 5 (minimal shortcomings).

RESULTS: The median number of total views was 22,450 (range 591-20,255,133) and the median number of views/month was 654 (range 9-723,398). 42 percent of the videos were posted by professional medical institutions, and 21% were posted by individual medical professionals. Most videos were aimed at the general public or patients suffering from ED. The median PEMAT understandability and actionability scores were both 100% (range 50-100% and 33-100%, respectively). The median DISCERN score was 2 (range 1-5) with 80.4% receiving a score of ≤3. Overall, 28% of the videos contained direct misinformation. DISCERN scores were higher in videos produced by medical institutions (P = .0104), not selling specific products (P = .007) and not promoting alternative medicine (P = .0002). The number of subscribers was an independent predictor of views/month (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION: Patients may be exposed to videos of poor quality when searching for information about ED on YouTube. The medical community needs to adapt a strategy to improve the quality of online medical information. Fode M, Nolsøe AB, Jacobsen FM, et al. Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Erectile Dysfunction. J Sex Med 2020;8:408-413.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSexual Medicine
Vol/bind8
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)408-413
Antal sider6
ISSN2050-1161
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ID: 61826177