TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric validation of the Internalised Stigma Scale for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (ISS-GDM)
T2 - a cross-sectional study
AU - Davidsen, Emma
AU - Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
AU - Christensen, Karl Bang
AU - Damm, Peter
AU - Byrne, Molly
AU - Dahl-Petersen, Inger K
AU - Mathiesen, Elisabeth R
AU - Jensen, Dorte M
AU - Vinter, Christina
AU - Kampmann, Ulla
AU - Ovesen, Per G
AU - Kragelund Nielsen, Karoline
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
PY - 2026/1/7
Y1 - 2026/1/7
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate the Internalised Stigma Scale for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (ISS-GDM), a questionnaire measuring self-reported internalised stigma among women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We hypothesised that internalised GDM stigma could be reliably and validly assessed through a short psychometric instrument.DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study.SETTING: Follow-up data from the Danish, multicentre Face-it trial for women with prior GDM and their families.PARTICIPANTS: In total, 248 women completed the ISS-GDM approximately 1 year after their GDM affected pregnancy.PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was psychometric properties of the ISS-GDM, assessed using Cronbach's alpha, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis (RA). Secondary outcomes included identification of item anomalies (local response dependence, differential item functioning).RESULTS: A large proportion of respondents endorsed statements reflecting self-disappointment, self-blame and an altered self-perception. Less endorsed statements included feeling inferior to other mothers or guilt towards family members due to GDM. The ISS-GDM demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. CFA indicated that item 2 assessing self-perceived capabilities as a mother did not load onto the main factor, while CFA and RA identified local response dependence and differential item functioning by body mass index. After adjustments, a two-factor solution supported calculating a sum score of items 1 and 3-11, with item 2 retained as a stand-alone indicator of perceived parenting capabilities. The 10-item scale demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.78).CONCLUSIONS: The ISS-GDM is a reliable and valid tool for assessing internalised stigma among women with prior GDM. Our findings further suggest that a substantial proportion of women with prior GDM experience self-blame and an altered self-perception due to their diagnosis. The ISS-GDM scale enables research into its prevalence, severity and consequences.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate the Internalised Stigma Scale for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (ISS-GDM), a questionnaire measuring self-reported internalised stigma among women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We hypothesised that internalised GDM stigma could be reliably and validly assessed through a short psychometric instrument.DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study.SETTING: Follow-up data from the Danish, multicentre Face-it trial for women with prior GDM and their families.PARTICIPANTS: In total, 248 women completed the ISS-GDM approximately 1 year after their GDM affected pregnancy.PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was psychometric properties of the ISS-GDM, assessed using Cronbach's alpha, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis (RA). Secondary outcomes included identification of item anomalies (local response dependence, differential item functioning).RESULTS: A large proportion of respondents endorsed statements reflecting self-disappointment, self-blame and an altered self-perception. Less endorsed statements included feeling inferior to other mothers or guilt towards family members due to GDM. The ISS-GDM demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. CFA indicated that item 2 assessing self-perceived capabilities as a mother did not load onto the main factor, while CFA and RA identified local response dependence and differential item functioning by body mass index. After adjustments, a two-factor solution supported calculating a sum score of items 1 and 3-11, with item 2 retained as a stand-alone indicator of perceived parenting capabilities. The 10-item scale demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.78).CONCLUSIONS: The ISS-GDM is a reliable and valid tool for assessing internalised stigma among women with prior GDM. Our findings further suggest that a substantial proportion of women with prior GDM experience self-blame and an altered self-perception due to their diagnosis. The ISS-GDM scale enables research into its prevalence, severity and consequences.
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Diabetes, Gestational/psychology
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Adult
KW - Social Stigma
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Denmark
KW - Factor Analysis, Statistical
KW - Self Concept
KW - Factor Analysis
KW - Stereotyping
KW - Surveys
KW - Questionnaires
KW - Statistical
KW - Diabetes in pregnancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105026924282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098109
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098109
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41500645
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 16
SP - e098109
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 1
M1 - e098109
ER -