TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychological consequences of lymphoedema associated with breast cancer
T2 - a prospective cohort study
AU - Vassard, Ditte
AU - Olsen, Maja Halgren
AU - Zinckernagel, Line
AU - Vibe-Petersen, Jette
AU - Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg
AU - Johansen, Christoffer
N1 - Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective cohort study of women attending a rehabilitation course at the Dallund Rehabilitation Centre was to explore the emotional and psychological aspects of living with lymphoedema, expressed as psychological distress, poorer quality of life and poorer self-reported health.METHODS: Between November 2002 and January 2007 within the FOCARE study, self-completed questionnaires were collected 3 weeks before and 6 and 12 months after the rehabilitation course to elicit sociodemographic, physical and lifestyle information and responses to three psychometric tests. The population consisted of 633 women, 125 with and 508 without verified lymphoedema (time since surgery, 1 month-5 years). The population was reduced to 553 women at the first follow-up and 494 at the second.RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that, in comparison with women without lymphoedema, those with lymphoedema had a 14% higher risk for scoring one level higher on the POMS-SF test, a 9% higher probability of scoring one point lower on the quality of life scale and a 29% higher likelihood of reporting poorer or bad health than women without lymphoedema. These findings were seen at all three measurement times.CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of women with breast cancer, women with lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer had significantly worse overall emotional well-being and adjustment to life compared to women without lymphoedema.
AB - BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective cohort study of women attending a rehabilitation course at the Dallund Rehabilitation Centre was to explore the emotional and psychological aspects of living with lymphoedema, expressed as psychological distress, poorer quality of life and poorer self-reported health.METHODS: Between November 2002 and January 2007 within the FOCARE study, self-completed questionnaires were collected 3 weeks before and 6 and 12 months after the rehabilitation course to elicit sociodemographic, physical and lifestyle information and responses to three psychometric tests. The population consisted of 633 women, 125 with and 508 without verified lymphoedema (time since surgery, 1 month-5 years). The population was reduced to 553 women at the first follow-up and 494 at the second.RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that, in comparison with women without lymphoedema, those with lymphoedema had a 14% higher risk for scoring one level higher on the POMS-SF test, a 9% higher probability of scoring one point lower on the quality of life scale and a 29% higher likelihood of reporting poorer or bad health than women without lymphoedema. These findings were seen at all three measurement times.CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of women with breast cancer, women with lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer had significantly worse overall emotional well-being and adjustment to life compared to women without lymphoedema.
KW - Adaptation, Psychological
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
KW - Emotions
KW - Female
KW - Health Status
KW - Humans
KW - Lymphedema/psychology
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Stress, Psychological
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.041
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.041
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 20797846
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 46
SP - 3211
EP - 3218
JO - European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
JF - European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
IS - 18
ER -