Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Prostate needle biopsies: interobserver variation and clinical consequences of histopathological re-evaluation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori strains among adults and children in a tertiary referral centre in Lithuania

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. A short history of microbial biofilms and biofilm infections

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Biofilms and host response - helpful or harmful

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. Diagnosis of biofilm infections in cystic fibrosis patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Novel functions of the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor in prostate cancer cells and patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Postembolization Syndrome after Prostatic Artery Embolization: A Systematic Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. AZGP1 Protein Expression in Hormone-Naïve Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated with Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Genotype-phenotype associations in PPGLs in 59 patients with variants in SDHX genes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
Histopathological grading of prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with significant interobserver variability. This, as well as clinical consequences of histopathological re-evaluation, was investigated. In 350 patients, histopathological re-evaluations of prostate biopsies were compared with primary pathology reports and with histopathology of the radical prostatectomy specimen. The consequences of re-evaluation for clinical workup and treatment of patients according to local algorithms were determined. For Gleason score (GS), complete agreement between primary report and re-evaluation was found in 76.9%. The cancers were assessed with higher GS at re-evaluation in 25.0% of patients in cases with primary GS ≤ 6, while scores were devaluated in 3.0% and 10.3% of the patients with primary GS = 7 and ≥ 8, respectively. Strategies for clinical evaluation and treatment were changed as a result of the biopsy re-evaluations in 19.7% and 13.1% of patients, respectively. Gleason scoring based on the radical prostatectomy specimen was higher than in both primary reports and re-evaluation of biopsies. Although a relatively high degree of concordance was found between biopsy assessments, the significant trend towards higher Gleason scoring at re-evaluation, leading to frequent changes in clinical assessments and surgical strategy, justifies re-evaluation of PCa biopsies in patients with primary GS ≤ 6.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Pathologica Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind119
Udgave nummer4-5
Sider (fra-til)239-46
Antal sider8
ISSN0903-4641
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2011

ID: 33229586