TY - JOUR
T1 - PROphylactic closed incision Negative-PRESSure treatment in open incisional hernia repair
T2 - Protocol for a multicenter randomized trial (PROPRESS study)
AU - Marckmann, Mads
AU - Henriksen, Nadia A
AU - Krarup, Peter-Martin
AU - Helgstrand, Frederik
AU - Vester-Glowinski, Peter
AU - Christoffersen, Mette Willaume
AU - Jensen, Kristian Kiim
N1 - © 2024 The Authors.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - BACKGROUND: Negative Pressure Therapy in closed incisions (ciNPT) after surgery has shown positive effects including reduction of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) incidence. In patients undergoing elective open incisional hernia repair, however, ciNPT is not standard care, perhaps due to high-quality evidence still not provided. This study hypothesizes that this patient group would benefit from ciNPT by reducing wound complications and improving postoperative quality of life.METHOD: This is a multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) including a total of 110 patients allocated in a 1:1 ratio with one intervention arm and one active control arm receiving ciNPT (i.e., Prevena™) and standard wound dressing, respectively. The primary outcome is the incidence of SSI at 30 days postoperatively and secondary outcomes are 1) pooled incidence of Surgical Site Occurrence (SSO), 2) patient-reported pain and satisfaction with the scar, and 3) hernia-related quality of life.CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing elective open incisional hernia repair are fragile with a high risk of wound complication development. This multicenter RCT seeks to deliver the high-quality evidence needed to establish the role ciNPT must play for exactly this group with the aim of reducing SSI incidence and health economic costs, and finally improving quality of life. There are no theoretical or clinical experience of unwanted consequences of this treatment.
AB - BACKGROUND: Negative Pressure Therapy in closed incisions (ciNPT) after surgery has shown positive effects including reduction of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) incidence. In patients undergoing elective open incisional hernia repair, however, ciNPT is not standard care, perhaps due to high-quality evidence still not provided. This study hypothesizes that this patient group would benefit from ciNPT by reducing wound complications and improving postoperative quality of life.METHOD: This is a multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) including a total of 110 patients allocated in a 1:1 ratio with one intervention arm and one active control arm receiving ciNPT (i.e., Prevena™) and standard wound dressing, respectively. The primary outcome is the incidence of SSI at 30 days postoperatively and secondary outcomes are 1) pooled incidence of Surgical Site Occurrence (SSO), 2) patient-reported pain and satisfaction with the scar, and 3) hernia-related quality of life.CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing elective open incisional hernia repair are fragile with a high risk of wound complication development. This multicenter RCT seeks to deliver the high-quality evidence needed to establish the role ciNPT must play for exactly this group with the aim of reducing SSI incidence and health economic costs, and finally improving quality of life. There are no theoretical or clinical experience of unwanted consequences of this treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182756728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101256
DO - 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101256
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38298916
SN - 2451-8654
VL - 38
JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
M1 - 101256
ER -