Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes from international randomised clinical trials on cancer: a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in glioma patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Characteristics of patients reporting symptoms by open-ended questions in specialist palliative care

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Determining minimal important change for the thyroid-related quality of life questionnaire ThyPRO

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Justyna Mierzynska
  • Claire Piccinin
  • Madeline Pe
  • Francesca Martinelli
  • Carolyn Gotay
  • Corneel Coens
  • Murielle Mauer
  • Alexander Eggermont
  • Mogens Groenvold
  • Kristin Bjordal
  • Jaap Reijneveld
  • Galina Velikova
  • Andrew Bottomley
Vis graf over relationer

A previous review published in 2008 highlighted the prognostic significance of baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as independent predictors of the overall survival of patients with cancer in clinical studies. In response to the methodological limitations of studies included in the previous review, recommendations were subsequently published in the same year to promote a higher level of methodological rigour in studies of prognostic factors. Our systematic review aimed to provide an update on progress with the implementation of these recommendations and to assess whether the methodological quality of prognostic factor analyses has changed over time. Of the 44 studies published between 2006 and 2018 that were included in our review, more standardisation and rigour of the methods used for prognostic factor analysis was found compared with the previous review. 41 (93%) of the trials reported at least one PRO domain as independently prognostic. The most common significant prognostic factors reported were physical functioning (17 [39%] studies) and global health or quality of life (15 [34%] studies). These findings highlight the value of PROs as prognostic or stratification factors in research across most types of cancer.

TidsskriftLancet Oncology
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)e685-e698
Antal sider14
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

ID: 58891671