TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence Estimates of Amyloid Abnormality Across the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum
AU - Jansen, Willemijn J
AU - Janssen, Olin
AU - Tijms, Betty M
AU - Vos, Stephanie J B
AU - Ossenkoppele, Rik
AU - Visser, Pieter Jelle
AU - Aarsland, Dag
AU - Alcolea, Daniel
AU - Altomare, Daniele
AU - von Arnim, Christine
AU - Baiardi, Simone
AU - Baldeiras, Ines
AU - Barthel, Henryk
AU - Bateman, Randall J
AU - Van Berckel, Bart
AU - Binette, Alexa Pichet
AU - Blennow, Kaj
AU - Boada, Merce
AU - Boecker, Henning
AU - Bottlaender, Michel
AU - den Braber, Anouk
AU - Brooks, David J
AU - Van Buchem, Mark A
AU - Camus, Vincent
AU - Carill, Jose Manuel
AU - Cerman, Jiri
AU - Chen, Kewei
AU - Chételat, Gaël
AU - Chipi, Elena
AU - Cohen, Ann D
AU - Daniels, Alisha
AU - Delarue, Marion
AU - Didic, Mira
AU - Drzezga, Alexander
AU - Dubois, Bruno
AU - Eckerström, Marie
AU - Ekblad, Laura L
AU - Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
AU - Epelbaum, Stéphane
AU - Fagan, Anne M
AU - Fan, Yong
AU - Fladby, Tormod
AU - Fleisher, Adam S
AU - Van der Flier, Wiesje M
AU - Förster, Stefan
AU - Fortea, Juan
AU - Frederiksen, Kristian Steen
AU - Johannsen, Peter
AU - Madsen, Karine
AU - Waldemar, Gunhild
AU - Amyloid Biomarker Study Group
PY - 2022/3/1
Y1 - 2022/3/1
N2 - IMPORTANCE: One characteristic histopathological event in Alzheimer disease (AD) is cerebral amyloid aggregation, which can be detected by biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and on positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Prevalence estimates of amyloid pathology are important for health care planning and clinical trial design.OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of amyloid abnormality in persons with normal cognition, subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, or clinical AD dementia and to examine the potential implications of cutoff methods, biomarker modality (CSF or PET), age, sex, APOE genotype, educational level, geographical region, and dementia severity for these estimates.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional, individual-participant pooled study included participants from 85 Amyloid Biomarker Study cohorts. Data collection was performed from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. Participants had normal cognition, subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, or clinical AD dementia. Normal cognition and subjective cognitive decline were defined by normal scores on cognitive tests, with the presence of cognitive complaints defining subjective cognitive decline. Mild cognitive impairment and clinical AD dementia were diagnosed according to published criteria.EXPOSURES: Alzheimer disease biomarkers detected on PET or in CSF.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Amyloid measurements were dichotomized as normal or abnormal using cohort-provided cutoffs for CSF or PET or by visual reading for PET. Adjusted data-driven cutoffs for abnormal amyloid were calculated using gaussian mixture modeling. Prevalence of amyloid abnormality was estimated according to age, sex, cognitive status, biomarker modality, APOE carrier status, educational level, geographical location, and dementia severity using generalized estimating equations.RESULTS: Among the 19 097 participants (mean [SD] age, 69.1 [9.8] years; 10 148 women [53.1%]) included, 10 139 (53.1%) underwent an amyloid PET scan and 8958 (46.9%) had an amyloid CSF measurement. Using cohort-provided cutoffs, amyloid abnormality prevalences were similar to 2015 estimates for individuals without dementia and were similar across PET- and CSF-based estimates (24%; 95% CI, 21%-28%) in participants with normal cognition, 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%) in participants with subjective cognitive decline, and 51% (95% CI, 46%-56%) in participants with mild cognitive impairment, whereas for clinical AD dementia the estimates were higher for PET than CSF (87% vs 79%; mean difference, 8%; 95% CI, 0%-16%; P = .04). Gaussian mixture modeling-based cutoffs for amyloid measures on PET scans were similar to cohort-provided cutoffs and were not adjusted. Adjusted CSF cutoffs resulted in a 10% higher amyloid abnormality prevalence than PET-based estimates in persons with normal cognition (mean difference, 9%; 95% CI, 3%-15%; P = .004), subjective cognitive decline (9%; 95% CI, 3%-15%; P = .005), and mild cognitive impairment (10%; 95% CI, 3%-17%; P = .004), whereas the estimates were comparable in persons with clinical AD dementia (mean difference, 4%; 95% CI, -2% to 9%; P = .18).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that CSF-based estimates using adjusted data-driven cutoffs were up to 10% higher than PET-based estimates in people without dementia, whereas the results were similar among people with dementia. This finding suggests that preclinical and prodromal AD may be more prevalent than previously estimated, which has important implications for clinical trial recruitment strategies and health care planning policies.
AB - IMPORTANCE: One characteristic histopathological event in Alzheimer disease (AD) is cerebral amyloid aggregation, which can be detected by biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and on positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Prevalence estimates of amyloid pathology are important for health care planning and clinical trial design.OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of amyloid abnormality in persons with normal cognition, subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, or clinical AD dementia and to examine the potential implications of cutoff methods, biomarker modality (CSF or PET), age, sex, APOE genotype, educational level, geographical region, and dementia severity for these estimates.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional, individual-participant pooled study included participants from 85 Amyloid Biomarker Study cohorts. Data collection was performed from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. Participants had normal cognition, subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, or clinical AD dementia. Normal cognition and subjective cognitive decline were defined by normal scores on cognitive tests, with the presence of cognitive complaints defining subjective cognitive decline. Mild cognitive impairment and clinical AD dementia were diagnosed according to published criteria.EXPOSURES: Alzheimer disease biomarkers detected on PET or in CSF.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Amyloid measurements were dichotomized as normal or abnormal using cohort-provided cutoffs for CSF or PET or by visual reading for PET. Adjusted data-driven cutoffs for abnormal amyloid were calculated using gaussian mixture modeling. Prevalence of amyloid abnormality was estimated according to age, sex, cognitive status, biomarker modality, APOE carrier status, educational level, geographical location, and dementia severity using generalized estimating equations.RESULTS: Among the 19 097 participants (mean [SD] age, 69.1 [9.8] years; 10 148 women [53.1%]) included, 10 139 (53.1%) underwent an amyloid PET scan and 8958 (46.9%) had an amyloid CSF measurement. Using cohort-provided cutoffs, amyloid abnormality prevalences were similar to 2015 estimates for individuals without dementia and were similar across PET- and CSF-based estimates (24%; 95% CI, 21%-28%) in participants with normal cognition, 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%) in participants with subjective cognitive decline, and 51% (95% CI, 46%-56%) in participants with mild cognitive impairment, whereas for clinical AD dementia the estimates were higher for PET than CSF (87% vs 79%; mean difference, 8%; 95% CI, 0%-16%; P = .04). Gaussian mixture modeling-based cutoffs for amyloid measures on PET scans were similar to cohort-provided cutoffs and were not adjusted. Adjusted CSF cutoffs resulted in a 10% higher amyloid abnormality prevalence than PET-based estimates in persons with normal cognition (mean difference, 9%; 95% CI, 3%-15%; P = .004), subjective cognitive decline (9%; 95% CI, 3%-15%; P = .005), and mild cognitive impairment (10%; 95% CI, 3%-17%; P = .004), whereas the estimates were comparable in persons with clinical AD dementia (mean difference, 4%; 95% CI, -2% to 9%; P = .18).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that CSF-based estimates using adjusted data-driven cutoffs were up to 10% higher than PET-based estimates in people without dementia, whereas the results were similar among people with dementia. This finding suggests that preclinical and prodromal AD may be more prevalent than previously estimated, which has important implications for clinical trial recruitment strategies and health care planning policies.
KW - Aged
KW - Alzheimer Disease/cerebrospinal fluid
KW - Amyloid beta-Peptides/cerebrospinal fluid
KW - Amyloidogenic Proteins
KW - Amyloidosis
KW - Apolipoproteins E/genetics
KW - Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid
KW - Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnostic imaging
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Peptide Fragments/cerebrospinal fluid
KW - Positron-Emission Tomography
KW - Prevalence
KW - tau Proteins/cerebrospinal fluid
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124123668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5216
DO - 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5216
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35099509
SN - 2168-6149
VL - 79
SP - 228
EP - 243
JO - JAMA Neurology
JF - JAMA Neurology
IS - 3
ER -