Pregnant women’s preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth – a six-country cohort study

Elsa Lena Ryding, Mirjam Lukasse, Hildur Kristjansdottir, Thora Steingrimsdottir, Berit Schei, Bidens Study Group, Elsa Lena Ryding (Medlem af forfattergruppering), Mirjam Lukasse (Medlem af forfattergruppering), Mirjam Lukasse (Medlem af forfattergruppering), Thora Steingrimsdottir (Medlem af forfattergruppering), Ann Tabor (Medlem af forfattergruppering), Helle Karro (Medlem af forfattergruppering), An Sofie Van Parys (Medlem af forfattergruppering), Hildur Kristjansdottir (Medlem af forfattergruppering), Anne Mette Schroll (Medlem af forfattergruppering), Made Laanpere (Medlem af forfattergruppering), Anne Marie Wangel (Medlem af forfattergruppering)

62 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The rate of cesarean section (CS) for non-medical reasons has risen and it is a concern for health care. Women’s preferences may vary across countries for psychosocial or obstetric reasons. Methods: A prospective cohort study of 6549 women in routine antenatal care giving birth in Belgium, Iceland, Denmark, Estonia, Norway or Sweden. Preference for mode of birth was self-reported in mid-pregnancy. Birth outcome data were collected from hospital records. Results: A CS was preferred by 3.5% of primiparous women and 8.7% of the multiparous women. Preference for CS was associated with severe fear of childbirth (FOC), with a negative birth experience in multiparous women and with depressive symptoms in the primiparous. Women were somewhat more prone to prefer a cesarean in Iceland, odd ratio (OR) 1.70 (1.02–2.83), adjusted for age, education, depression, FOC, history of abuse, previous cesarean and negative birth experience. Out of the 404 women who preferred CS during pregnancy, 286 (70.8%) delivered by CS, mostly for a medical indication. A total of 9% of the cesareans in the cohort had a non-medical indication only. Conclusions: Women’s preference for CS often seems to be due to health concerns. Both medical and psychological factors need to be addressed in antenatal counseling. Obstetricians need to convey accurately to women the risks and benefits of CS in her specific case. Maternity professionals should identify and explore psychosocial reasons for women’s preferences.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology
Vol/bind37
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)75-83
Antal sider9
ISSN0167-482X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2 jul. 2016
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Pregnant women’s preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth – a six-country cohort study'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater