Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Predictors of treatment outcomes for trauma-affected refugees - results from two randomised trials

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Treatment patterns in patients with treatment-resistant depression in Danish patients with major depressive disorder

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. A Rasch-based validity study of the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. The Accuracy of Traumatic Memories in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewpeer review

  2. A rasch-based validity study of the HSCL-25

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Introduction: Treatment effects in trials with trauma-affected refugees vary considerably between studies, but the variability in outcome between individual patients is often overlooked. Consequently, we know little about why some patients benefit more from treatment than others. The aim of the study was therefore to identify predictors of treatment outcome for refugees with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Methods: Data was derived from two randomised trials including 321 refugees, who had all participated in a 6-7 months bio-psycho-social treatment programme. Outcome measures were the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (PTSD, self-rating), Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (depression and anxiety, self-rating) and Hamilton Depression and Anxiety rating scales (observer-ratings). Using hierarchical regressions models, associations were analysed between pre- to post treatment score changes (dependent variable) and a range of variables including sociodemographics, pre-migration trauma, post-migratory stressors, baseline symptom scores and level of functioning. Results: A high baseline score (=more symptoms) and a high level of functioning were found to be associated with improvement on all ratings. Additionally, the following variables were associated with symptom improvement on at least one outcome measure: short time in host country, full time occupation, young age and status as family reunified (in contrast to refugee status). Being Muslim was inversely correlated with improvement. Limitations: Translated self-ratings were used, which could impact reliability. Conclusion: These results call for screening and early interventions for arriving refugees. For clinical populations, level of functioning should be included in assessments of refugees, to possibly begin stratifying samples to different interventions based on their likelihood of responding.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Affective Disorders
Vol/bind282
Sider (fra-til)194-202
Antal sider9
ISSN0165-0327
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 mar. 2021

ID: 61652537