TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of progression to type 1 diabetes with dynamic biomarkers and risk scores
AU - Joglekar, Mugdha V
AU - Kaur, Simranjeet
AU - Pociot, Flemming
AU - Hardikar, Anandwardhan A
N1 - Copyright © 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Identifying biomarkers of functional β-cell loss is an important step in the risk stratification of type 1 diabetes. Genetic risk scores (GRS), generated by profiling an array of single nucleotide polymorphisms, are a widely used type 1 diabetes risk-prediction tool. Type 1 diabetes screening studies have relied on a combination of biochemical (autoantibody) and GRS screening methodologies for identifying individuals at high-risk of type 1 diabetes. A limitation of these screening tools is that the presence of autoantibodies marks the initiation of β-cell loss, and is therefore not the best biomarker of progression to early-stage type 1 diabetes. GRS, on the other hand, represents a static biomarker offering a single risk score over an individual's lifetime. In this Personal View, we explore the challenges and opportunities of static and dynamic biomarkers in the prediction of progression to type 1 diabetes. We discuss future directions wherein newer dynamic risk scores could be used to predict type 1 diabetes risk, assess the efficacy of new and emerging drugs to retard, or prevent type 1 diabetes, and possibly replace or further enhance the predictive ability offered by static biomarkers, such as GRS.
AB - Identifying biomarkers of functional β-cell loss is an important step in the risk stratification of type 1 diabetes. Genetic risk scores (GRS), generated by profiling an array of single nucleotide polymorphisms, are a widely used type 1 diabetes risk-prediction tool. Type 1 diabetes screening studies have relied on a combination of biochemical (autoantibody) and GRS screening methodologies for identifying individuals at high-risk of type 1 diabetes. A limitation of these screening tools is that the presence of autoantibodies marks the initiation of β-cell loss, and is therefore not the best biomarker of progression to early-stage type 1 diabetes. GRS, on the other hand, represents a static biomarker offering a single risk score over an individual's lifetime. In this Personal View, we explore the challenges and opportunities of static and dynamic biomarkers in the prediction of progression to type 1 diabetes. We discuss future directions wherein newer dynamic risk scores could be used to predict type 1 diabetes risk, assess the efficacy of new and emerging drugs to retard, or prevent type 1 diabetes, and possibly replace or further enhance the predictive ability offered by static biomarkers, such as GRS.
KW - Autoantibodies/blood
KW - Biomarkers/analysis
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis
KW - Disease Progression
KW - Genetic Predisposition to Disease
KW - Humans
KW - Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
KW - Risk Assessment/methods
KW - Risk Factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195373767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00103-7
DO - 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00103-7
M3 - Review
C2 - 38797187
SN - 2213-8587
VL - 12
SP - 483
EP - 492
JO - The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
JF - The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
IS - 7
ER -