TY - JOUR
T1 - Precision of tuberculosis diagnosis codes in the Central Denmark Region
AU - Dahl, Victor Næstholt
AU - Moestrup, Pernille Grand
AU - Koch, Anders
AU - Folkvardsen, Dorte Bek
AU - Rudolf, Frauke
AU - Gissel, Tina Nørregaard
AU - Fløe, Andreas
N1 - Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
PY - 2025/6/12
Y1 - 2025/6/12
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Correct use of tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis codes is essential for patient care, surveillance and resource allocation. We aimed to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) of TB diagnosis codes.METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with International Classification of Diseases, tenth version (ICD-10) TB diagnosis codes from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2023, at two TB centres in the Central Denmark Region. Confirmed TB was defined as microbiologically confirmed TB, prescription of ≥ 3 first- or second-line TB drugs, or TB notification. All patients who did not meet these criteria and those who received fewer than three TB drugs or lacked TB notification underwent manual hospital record review to verify or exclude the TB diagnosis. PPVs were calculated as the proportion of confirmed TB diagnoses among all patients with a TB diagnosis code.RESULTS: In total, 185/230 patients were confirmed to have TB, yielding a PPV of 80% (95% CI: 75; 85). The PPVs for TB microbiology, TB prescriptions and TB notification exceeded 95% individually. Excluding TB lupus codes increased the PPV to 89% (95% CI: 84; 93). Patients with more than one different type of TB diagnosis code had a PPV of 100% (95% CI: 93; 100). Additionally, PPVs were high when TB diagnosis codes appeared on multiple occasions, increasing with the number of occurrences (≥ 2: 85%, ≥ 3: 89%, ≥ 4: 93%).CONCLUSION: TB ICD-10 diagnosis codes demonstrate a moderately high PPV in Denmark, particularly when excluding TB lupus codes, highlighting the importance and complexities of diagnostic coding.FUNDING: None.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Correct use of tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis codes is essential for patient care, surveillance and resource allocation. We aimed to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) of TB diagnosis codes.METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with International Classification of Diseases, tenth version (ICD-10) TB diagnosis codes from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2023, at two TB centres in the Central Denmark Region. Confirmed TB was defined as microbiologically confirmed TB, prescription of ≥ 3 first- or second-line TB drugs, or TB notification. All patients who did not meet these criteria and those who received fewer than three TB drugs or lacked TB notification underwent manual hospital record review to verify or exclude the TB diagnosis. PPVs were calculated as the proportion of confirmed TB diagnoses among all patients with a TB diagnosis code.RESULTS: In total, 185/230 patients were confirmed to have TB, yielding a PPV of 80% (95% CI: 75; 85). The PPVs for TB microbiology, TB prescriptions and TB notification exceeded 95% individually. Excluding TB lupus codes increased the PPV to 89% (95% CI: 84; 93). Patients with more than one different type of TB diagnosis code had a PPV of 100% (95% CI: 93; 100). Additionally, PPVs were high when TB diagnosis codes appeared on multiple occasions, increasing with the number of occurrences (≥ 2: 85%, ≥ 3: 89%, ≥ 4: 93%).CONCLUSION: TB ICD-10 diagnosis codes demonstrate a moderately high PPV in Denmark, particularly when excluding TB lupus codes, highlighting the importance and complexities of diagnostic coding.FUNDING: None.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.
KW - Humans
KW - Denmark/epidemiology
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Tuberculosis/diagnosis
KW - Female
KW - International Classification of Diseases/standards
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105010287652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.61409/A12240847
DO - 10.61409/A12240847
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40600676
SN - 1603-9629
VL - 72
JO - Danish Medical Journal
JF - Danish Medical Journal
IS - 7
M1 - A12240847
ER -