TY - JOUR
T1 - Practice patterns and outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic device removal in patients with non-surgically managed infective endocarditis
AU - Alhakak, Amna
AU - Østergaard, Lauge
AU - Bruun, Niels Eske
AU - Ruwald, Anne Christine
AU - Philbert, Berit Thornvig
AU - Vinther, Michael
AU - Jørgensen, Peter Godsk
AU - Havers-Borgersen, Eva
AU - Bengtsen, Kasper Høtoft
AU - Jensen, Louise Kruse
AU - Povlsen, Jonas Agerlund
AU - Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
AU - Johansen, Jens Brock
AU - Voldstedlund, Marianne
AU - Moser, Claus
AU - Bundgaard, Henning
AU - Køber, Lars
AU - Fosbøl, Emil Loldrup
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background Current guidelines recommend complete removal of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) in patients with infective endocarditis (IE), although these recommendations are largely based on expert opinion (level of evidence C). We aimed to examine outcomes stratified by CIED removal status in patients with IE. Methods Using Danish nationwide registries (2010–2021), we identified patients aged ≥18 years with first-time IE, who were alive at discharge, managed without valve surgery and had a CIED. Patients who underwent CIED removal during IE admission were compared with those without removal. The study outcomes were IE readmission, recurrent bacteraemia (including IE with the same microbial aetiology) and all-cause mortality within 6months after discharge. Results The study population comprised 1040 patients with non-surgically managed IE and a CIED, and among these, 596 (57.3%) underwent CIED removal during admission. Patients who underwent removal were younger and less frail than those without removal. In the removal versus non-removal group, the 6-month cumulative incidences were 2.5% (95% CI 1.4% to 4.1%) vs 7.1% (95% CI 4.9% to 9.9%) for IE readmission (p value <0.001), 2.1% (95% CI 1.1% to 3.5%) vs 5.2% (95% CI 3.4% to 7.6%) for recurrent bacteraemia (p value=0.005) and 11.5% (95% CI 9.1% to 14.3%) vs 20.0% (95% CI 16.4% to 23.9%) for all-cause mortality (p value <0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models, CIED removal was associated with lower 6-month rates of IE readmission (HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.79)) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.996)), compared with no removal. Conclusions In this nationwide study of patients with non-surgically managed IE and a CIED, CIED removal was associated with significantly lower 6-month rates of IE readmission, recurrent bacteraemia and mortality compared with no removal, supporting current guideline recommendations. However, randomised clinical trials are warranted to determine the most effective treatment strategy.
AB - Background Current guidelines recommend complete removal of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) in patients with infective endocarditis (IE), although these recommendations are largely based on expert opinion (level of evidence C). We aimed to examine outcomes stratified by CIED removal status in patients with IE. Methods Using Danish nationwide registries (2010–2021), we identified patients aged ≥18 years with first-time IE, who were alive at discharge, managed without valve surgery and had a CIED. Patients who underwent CIED removal during IE admission were compared with those without removal. The study outcomes were IE readmission, recurrent bacteraemia (including IE with the same microbial aetiology) and all-cause mortality within 6months after discharge. Results The study population comprised 1040 patients with non-surgically managed IE and a CIED, and among these, 596 (57.3%) underwent CIED removal during admission. Patients who underwent removal were younger and less frail than those without removal. In the removal versus non-removal group, the 6-month cumulative incidences were 2.5% (95% CI 1.4% to 4.1%) vs 7.1% (95% CI 4.9% to 9.9%) for IE readmission (p value <0.001), 2.1% (95% CI 1.1% to 3.5%) vs 5.2% (95% CI 3.4% to 7.6%) for recurrent bacteraemia (p value=0.005) and 11.5% (95% CI 9.1% to 14.3%) vs 20.0% (95% CI 16.4% to 23.9%) for all-cause mortality (p value <0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models, CIED removal was associated with lower 6-month rates of IE readmission (HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.79)) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.996)), compared with no removal. Conclusions In this nationwide study of patients with non-surgically managed IE and a CIED, CIED removal was associated with significantly lower 6-month rates of IE readmission, recurrent bacteraemia and mortality compared with no removal, supporting current guideline recommendations. However, randomised clinical trials are warranted to determine the most effective treatment strategy.
KW - Defibrillators, Implantable
KW - Endocarditis
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Outcome Assessment, Health Care
KW - Pacemaker, Artificial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105025482569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/heartjnl-2025-327223
DO - 10.1136/heartjnl-2025-327223
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41402041
AN - SCOPUS:105025482569
SN - 1355-6037
JO - Heart
JF - Heart
ER -