Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Phase I trial of 18F-Fludeoxyglucose based radiation dose painting with concomitant cisplatin in head and neck cancer

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Diffusion MRI outlined viable tumour volume beats GTV in intra-treatment stratification of outcome

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Diabetes increases the risk of serious adverse events after re-irradiation of the spine

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Influence of volumetric modulated arc therapy and FET-PET scanning on treatment outcomes for glioblastoma patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. FDG-PET/CT in the surveillance of head and neck cancer following radiotherapy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Patterns of treatment failure in patients undergoing adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy for vulvar cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: The CONTRAST (CONventional vs.Tumor Recurrence Adapted Specification of Target dose) phase I trial tested the safety of FDG PET guided dose redistribution in patients receiving accelerated chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS: CONTRAST was designed with two pre-defined dose-escalation steps to the FDG PET-avid volume (GTVPET). The primary end point was any early grade 4+ toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE). The dose to GTVPET was escalated to a uniform prescription of 82Gy EQD2 in the first step. All patients received accelerated radiotherapy (6 fractions a week) delivering 34 fractions of 2.34Gy to the GTVPET as well as concomitant weekly cisplatin. Inclusion criteria were (1) primary SCC of oral cavity, oro- or hypo-pharynx, or laynx, (2) candidates for concomitant chemo-radiotherapy and (3) p16 negative tumors or p16 positive tumors in patients with smoking history of >10 pack years. GTVPET was defined by a specialist in nuclear medicine and a radiologist, while the anatomic GTV was defined in collaboration between an oncologist and a radiologist.

RESULTS: Median follow up time from the end of treatment was 18months (range 7-21months). All 15 patients completed treatment without interruptions and no incidents of early grade 4+ toxicity were observed. Four patients had ulceration at the evaluation two months after treatment, two have subsequently healed, but two remain, raising concerns regarding late effects.

CONCLUSIONS: With all 15 cases having completed four month follow up and no incidence of early grade 4+ toxicity FDG PET based dose escalation to 82Gy passed the protocol-defined criterion for dose escalation. However, two cases of concern regarding late outcome led us to refrain from further dose escalation and proceed with the current dose level in a larger comparative effectiveness trial.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Vol/bind120
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)76-80
Antal sider5
ISSN0167-8140
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jul. 2016

ID: 49670002