Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

PET/CT-guided treatment planning for paediatric cancer patients: a simulation study of proton and conventional photon therapy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Feasibility of a novel liquid fiducial marker for use in image guided radiotherapy of oesophageal cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Evaluation of uterine ultrasound imaging in cervical radiotherapy; a comparison of autoscan and conventional probe

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of including fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in the planning of paediatric radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS: Target volumes were first delineated without and subsequently re-delineated with access to (18)F-FDG PET scan information, on duplicate CT sets. RT plans were generated for three-dimensional conformal photon RT (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). The results were evaluated by comparison of target volumes, target dose coverage parameters, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and estimated risk of secondary cancer (SC).

RESULTS: Considerable deviations between CT- and PET/CT-guided target volumes were seen in 3 out of the 11 patients studied. However, averaging over the whole cohort, CT or PET/CT guidance introduced no significant difference in the shape or size of the target volumes, target dose coverage, irradiated volumes, estimated NTCP or SC risk, neither for IMPT nor 3DCRT.

CONCLUSION: Our results imply that the inclusion of PET/CT scans in the RT planning process could have considerable impact for individual patients. There were no general trends of increasing or decreasing irradiated volumes, suggesting that the long-term morbidity of RT in childhood would on average remain largely unaffected.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: (18)F-FDG PET-based RT planning does not systematically change NTCP or SC risk for paediatric cancer patients compared with CT only. 3 out of 11 patients had a distinct change of target volumes when PET-guided planning was introduced. Dice and mismatch metrics are not sufficient to assess the consequences of target volume differences in the context of RT.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe British journal of radiology
Vol/bind88
Udgave nummer1047
Sider (fra-til)20140586
ISSN0007-1285
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2015

ID: 46268165