Perioperative outcome assessment from the perspectives of different stakeholders: need for reconsideration?

Fariba Abbassi, Carmen Walbert, Henrik Kehlet, Michael P W Grocott, Milo A Puhan, Pierre-Alain Clavien*

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde
2 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Standardised and universal perioperative endpoint reporting are the cornerstone for outcomes assessment, reliable clinical trials, and health services research. The Outcome4medicine initiative recently reported consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions, proposing a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions. In the same field, the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine - Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) group recently proposed standardised and valid measures of mortality and morbidity, derived from a three-stage Delphi process. Here a core group of the Outcome4medicine conference discusses how these two initiatives are aligned and emphasises the importance of standardised outcome assessment by integrating the perspectives of different stakeholders.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Vol/bind131
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)969-971
Antal sider3
ISSN0007-0912
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Perioperative outcome assessment from the perspectives of different stakeholders: need for reconsideration?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater