Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Perioperative Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Rectal Cancer; MR Colonography Versus Standard Care

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. 1H MRS Assessment of Hepatic Fat Content: Comparison Between Normal- and Excess-weight Children and Adolescents

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Preoperative evaluation of synchronous colorectal cancer using MR colonography

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Mesenteric traction syndrome in pigs: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Author Correction: Cardiac hypoxic resistance and decreasing lactate during maximum apnea in elite breath hold divers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative colonic evaluation is often inadequate because of cancer stenosis making a full conventional colonoscopy (CC) impossible. In several studies, cancer stenosis has been shown in up to 16%-34% of patients with colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the completion rate of preoperative colonic evaluation and the quality of perioperative colonic evaluation using magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) in patients with rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer were randomized to either group A: standard preoperative diagnostic work-up or group B: preoperative MR diagnostic work-up (standard preoperative diagnostic work-up + MRC). A complete and adequate perioperative clean-colon evaluation (PCE) was defined as either a complete preoperative colonic evaluation or a complete colonic evaluation within 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were randomized to group A and 28 to group B. Complete preoperative colonic evaluation with CC was achieved in 39% patients in group A and 93% for group B (Fisher's exact test, P < .001). PCE with CC was achieved in 64% and 93% in groups A and B, respectively (Fisher's exact test, P = .02). In group A, one synchronous cancer was found by CC. However, the location was misjudged as a sigmoid cancer. In group B, two synchronous cancers were found in the same patient who had an insufficient preoperative CC due to an obstructing rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS: MRC is a valuable tool and is recommended as part of the standard preoperative evaluation for patients with rectal cancer.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAcademic Radiology
Vol/bind22
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)1522-8
Antal sider7
ISSN1076-6332
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2015

ID: 45793845