TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in adult critically ill patients receiving vasopressor therapy
AU - Friman, Ola
AU - Soltani, Navid
AU - Lind, Marcus
AU - Zetterqvist, Pia
AU - Balintescu, Anca
AU - Perner, Anders
AU - Oldner, Anders
AU - Rooyackers, Olav
AU - Mårtensson, Johan
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Background: Subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may facilitate glucose control in the ICU. We aimed to assess the accuracy of CGM (Dexcom G6) against arterial blood glucose (ABG) in adult critically ill patients receiving intravenous insulin infusion and vasopressor therapy. We also aimed to assess feasibility and tolerability of CGM in this setting. Methods: We included ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation, insulin, and vasopressor therapy. Numerical accuracy was assessed by the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), overall, across arterial glucose strata, over different noradrenaline equivalent infusion rates, and over time since CGM start. MARD <14% was considered acceptable. Clinical accuracy was assessed using Clarke Error Grid (CEG) analysis. Feasibility outcome included number and duration of interrupted sensor readings due to signal loss. Tolerability outcome included skin reactions related to sensor insertion or sensor adhesives. Results: We obtained 2946 paired samples from 40 patients (18 with type 2 diabetes) receiving a median (IQR) maximum noradrenaline equivalent infusion rate of 0.18 (0.08-0.33) µg/kg/min during CGM. Overall, MARD was 12.7% (95% CI 10.7-15.3), and 99.8% of CGM readings were within CEG zones A and B. MARD values ≥14% were observed when ABG was outside target range (6-10 mmol/L [108-180 mg/dL]) and with noradrenaline equivalent infusion rates above 0.10 µg/kg/min. Accuracy improved with time after CGM start, reaching MARD values <14% after 36 h. We observed four episodes of interrupted sensor readings due to signal loss, ranging from 5 to 20 min. We observed no skin reaction related to sensor insertion or sensor adhesives. Conclusions: In our ICU cohort of patients receiving vasopressor infusion, subcutaneous CGM demonstrated acceptable overall numerical and clinical accuracy. However, suboptimal accuracy may occur outside glucose ranges of 6-10 mmol/L (108-180 mg/dL), during higher dose vasopressor infusion, and during the first 36 h after CGM start.
AB - Background: Subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may facilitate glucose control in the ICU. We aimed to assess the accuracy of CGM (Dexcom G6) against arterial blood glucose (ABG) in adult critically ill patients receiving intravenous insulin infusion and vasopressor therapy. We also aimed to assess feasibility and tolerability of CGM in this setting. Methods: We included ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation, insulin, and vasopressor therapy. Numerical accuracy was assessed by the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), overall, across arterial glucose strata, over different noradrenaline equivalent infusion rates, and over time since CGM start. MARD <14% was considered acceptable. Clinical accuracy was assessed using Clarke Error Grid (CEG) analysis. Feasibility outcome included number and duration of interrupted sensor readings due to signal loss. Tolerability outcome included skin reactions related to sensor insertion or sensor adhesives. Results: We obtained 2946 paired samples from 40 patients (18 with type 2 diabetes) receiving a median (IQR) maximum noradrenaline equivalent infusion rate of 0.18 (0.08-0.33) µg/kg/min during CGM. Overall, MARD was 12.7% (95% CI 10.7-15.3), and 99.8% of CGM readings were within CEG zones A and B. MARD values ≥14% were observed when ABG was outside target range (6-10 mmol/L [108-180 mg/dL]) and with noradrenaline equivalent infusion rates above 0.10 µg/kg/min. Accuracy improved with time after CGM start, reaching MARD values <14% after 36 h. We observed four episodes of interrupted sensor readings due to signal loss, ranging from 5 to 20 min. We observed no skin reaction related to sensor insertion or sensor adhesives. Conclusions: In our ICU cohort of patients receiving vasopressor infusion, subcutaneous CGM demonstrated acceptable overall numerical and clinical accuracy. However, suboptimal accuracy may occur outside glucose ranges of 6-10 mmol/L (108-180 mg/dL), during higher dose vasopressor infusion, and during the first 36 h after CGM start.
KW - accuracy
KW - continuous glucose monitoring
KW - critical illness
KW - diabetes
KW - Intensive Care Units
KW - Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Critical Illness
KW - Insulin/administration & dosage
KW - Male
KW - Norepinephrine/administration & dosage
KW - Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage
KW - Monitoring, Physiologic/methods
KW - Respiration, Artificial
KW - Feasibility Studies
KW - Blood Glucose/analysis
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy
KW - Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Aged
KW - Continuous Glucose Monitoring
KW - Infusions, Intravenous
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195030873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/dia.2024.0035
DO - 10.1089/dia.2024.0035
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38758211
SN - 1520-9156
VL - 26
SP - 763
EP - 772
JO - Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
JF - Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
IS - 10
ER -