TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance measures for endoscopic ultrasound
T2 - a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative – Update 2025
AU - Karstensen, John Gásdal
AU - Ahmed, Wafaa
AU - Anderloni, Andrea
AU - Domagk, Dirk
AU - Facciorusso, Antonio
AU - Hollenbach, Markus
AU - Kalaitzakis, Evangelos
AU - Poley, Jan-Werner
AU - Ribeiro, Suzane
AU - Seicean, Andrada
AU - Tarantino, Ilaria
AU - Ferlitsch, Monika
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
PY - 2026/1/1
Y1 - 2026/1/1
N2 - The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommends that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following six key performance measures for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for monitoring and evaluation in daily practice at center and endoscopist level: (1) informed patient consent (100 % of procedures); (2) adequate documentation of landmarks (≥ 90 % of procedures); (3) structured training and supervision for trainees, preferably using assessment tools (≥ 20 %); (4) standardized description of pancreatic cystic lesions (≥ 85 %); (5) diagnostic tissue acquisition with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/fine-needle biopsy for solid lesions (≥ 85 %); (6) adverse events (< 5 % in cystic and < 3 % in solid lesions). A recommendation to administer antibiotics for EUS-guided puncture of cystic lesions, included in the previous ESGE quality improvement document, has been omitted in the current version based on recent evidence.
AB - The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommends that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following six key performance measures for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for monitoring and evaluation in daily practice at center and endoscopist level: (1) informed patient consent (100 % of procedures); (2) adequate documentation of landmarks (≥ 90 % of procedures); (3) structured training and supervision for trainees, preferably using assessment tools (≥ 20 %); (4) standardized description of pancreatic cystic lesions (≥ 85 %); (5) diagnostic tissue acquisition with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/fine-needle biopsy for solid lesions (≥ 85 %); (6) adverse events (< 5 % in cystic and < 3 % in solid lesions). A recommendation to administer antibiotics for EUS-guided puncture of cystic lesions, included in the previous ESGE quality improvement document, has been omitted in the current version based on recent evidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105021659681&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/a-2716-7763
DO - 10.1055/a-2716-7763
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41224207
AN - SCOPUS:105021659681
SN - 0013-726X
VL - 58
SP - 91
EP - 101
JO - Endoscopy
JF - Endoscopy
IS - 1
ER -