TY - JOUR
T1 - PD-L1 expression in breast cancer
T2 - expression in subtypes and prognostic significance: a systematic review
AU - Stovgaard, Elisabeth Specht
AU - Dyhl-Polk, Anne
AU - Roslind, Anne
AU - Balslev, Eva
AU - Nielsen, Dorte
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature on the expression of PD-L1 in primary BC, variation of expression between subtypes and effect on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Additionally, for studies in the neoadjuvant setting, we have reviewed the ability of PD-L1 to predict pathological complete response (pCR).METHODS: Articles included in this review were retrieved by searching PubMed (1966-2018) and EMBASE (1980-2018). The following search terms were used: "PD-L1 expression" and "breast cancer" (PubMed234; EMBASE 161).RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles were found relevant to this study. We summarize important findings from these works, and show that the observed PD-L1 expression in the studies varies greatly, with expression rates ranging from 0 to 83% across subtypes. PD-L1 expression in relation to prognosis both in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting remains controversial, with studies finding better, worse, or no effect on prognosis. We also show that a wide variety of strategies are used when evaluating PD-L1 immunohistochemically, e.g., different cut-off points, different cell types evaluated, and different perceptions of when a cell is positive for PD-L1 (cytoplasmic vs membrane staining).CONCLUSION: Further investigation of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and its effect on prognosis is required. There is little consensus on the methods used to evaluate PD-L1 expression immunohistochemically, and this may contribute to the diverging results found in this study.
AB - PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature on the expression of PD-L1 in primary BC, variation of expression between subtypes and effect on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Additionally, for studies in the neoadjuvant setting, we have reviewed the ability of PD-L1 to predict pathological complete response (pCR).METHODS: Articles included in this review were retrieved by searching PubMed (1966-2018) and EMBASE (1980-2018). The following search terms were used: "PD-L1 expression" and "breast cancer" (PubMed234; EMBASE 161).RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles were found relevant to this study. We summarize important findings from these works, and show that the observed PD-L1 expression in the studies varies greatly, with expression rates ranging from 0 to 83% across subtypes. PD-L1 expression in relation to prognosis both in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting remains controversial, with studies finding better, worse, or no effect on prognosis. We also show that a wide variety of strategies are used when evaluating PD-L1 immunohistochemically, e.g., different cut-off points, different cell types evaluated, and different perceptions of when a cell is positive for PD-L1 (cytoplasmic vs membrane staining).CONCLUSION: Further investigation of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and its effect on prognosis is required. There is little consensus on the methods used to evaluate PD-L1 expression immunohistochemically, and this may contribute to the diverging results found in this study.
KW - B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism
KW - Biomarkers, Tumor
KW - Breast Neoplasms/classification
KW - Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
KW - Disease-Free Survival
KW - Female
KW - Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
KW - Humans
KW - Neoadjuvant Therapy
KW - Prognosis
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1007/s10549-019-05130-1
DO - 10.1007/s10549-019-05130-1
M3 - Review
C2 - 30627961
VL - 174
SP - 571
EP - 584
JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
SN - 0167-6806
IS - 3
ER -