Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Patients with persistent medically unexplained physical symptoms: a descriptive study from Norwegian general practice

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Theory and interpretation in qualitative studies from general practice: Why and how?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Family caregivers' views on coordination of care in Huntington's disease: a qualitative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Understanding medical symptoms: a conceptual review and analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Further research on effective interventions for patients with peristent Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms (MUPS) in general practice is needed. Prevalence estimates of such patients are conflicting, and other descriptive knowledge is needed for development and evaluation of effective future interventions. In this study, we aimed to estimate the consultation prevalence of patients with persistent MUPS in general practice, including patients' characteristics and symptom pattern, employment status and use of social benefits, and the general practitioners' (GPs) management strategy.

METHOD: During a four-week period the participating Norwegian GPs (n=84) registered all consultations with patients who met a strict definition of MUPS (>3 months duration and function loss), using a questionnaire with simple tick-off questions. Analyses were performed with descriptive statistics for all variables and split analysis on gender and age.

RESULTS: The GPs registered 526 patients among their total of 17 688 consultations, giving a consultation prevalence of persistent MUPS of 3%. The mean age of patients was 46 years, and 399 (76%) were women. The most frequent group of symptoms was musculoskeletal problems, followed by asthenia/fatigue. There was no significant gender difference in symptom pattern. Almost half of the patients were currently working (45%), significantly more men. The major GP management strategy was supportive counseling.

CONCLUSION: A consultation prevalence rate of 3% implies that patients with persistent MUPS are common in general practice. Our study disclosed heterogeneity among the patients such as differences in employment status, which emphasizes the importance of personalized focus rather than unsubstantiated stereotyping of "MUPS patients" as a group.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftB M C Family Practice
Vol/bind15
Sider (fra-til)107
ISSN1471-2296
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2014

ID: 45514345