Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair are insufficiently validated: a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{8863520af8364334a53edbdb36df5b27,
title = "Patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair are insufficiently validated: a systematic review",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To systematically assess the validity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs. PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO were consulted.STUDY SELECTION: Only studies explicitly aimed at validation of PROMs specific for patients with inguinal hernia were included.DATA EXTRACTION: Data regarding measurement properties of PROMs were extracted from the included studies. Each study was critically assessed for methodological quality and each PROM was evaluated for sufficient measurement properties.RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 15 studies, covering 11 different PROMs. The Carolinas Comfort Scale was the most frequently investigated PROM, being covered in five of the included publications. The included PROMs were evaluated according to nine different measurement properties, of which internal consistency and construct validity were the most frequently assessed. Evidence regarding content validity and structural validity was universally inadequate, according to the criteria for good measurement properties, as defined by the COSMIN.CONCLUSION: Based on the current evidence, it is not possible to formulate recommendations for application of PROMs for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Further validation of the included PROMs is necessary especially regarding content validity and structural validity.",
keywords = "COSMIN, Inguinal hernia, Patient-reported outcome, PROM, Questionnaire, Validity",
author = "Anders Gram-Hanssen and Anders Tolstrup and Dennis Zetner and Jacob Rosenberg",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.",
year = "2020",
month = may,
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzaa019",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "223--230",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair are insufficiently validated

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Gram-Hanssen, Anders

AU - Tolstrup, Anders

AU - Zetner, Dennis

AU - Rosenberg, Jacob

N1 - © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PY - 2020/5

Y1 - 2020/5

N2 - PURPOSE: To systematically assess the validity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs. PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO were consulted.STUDY SELECTION: Only studies explicitly aimed at validation of PROMs specific for patients with inguinal hernia were included.DATA EXTRACTION: Data regarding measurement properties of PROMs were extracted from the included studies. Each study was critically assessed for methodological quality and each PROM was evaluated for sufficient measurement properties.RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 15 studies, covering 11 different PROMs. The Carolinas Comfort Scale was the most frequently investigated PROM, being covered in five of the included publications. The included PROMs were evaluated according to nine different measurement properties, of which internal consistency and construct validity were the most frequently assessed. Evidence regarding content validity and structural validity was universally inadequate, according to the criteria for good measurement properties, as defined by the COSMIN.CONCLUSION: Based on the current evidence, it is not possible to formulate recommendations for application of PROMs for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Further validation of the included PROMs is necessary especially regarding content validity and structural validity.

AB - PURPOSE: To systematically assess the validity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs. PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO were consulted.STUDY SELECTION: Only studies explicitly aimed at validation of PROMs specific for patients with inguinal hernia were included.DATA EXTRACTION: Data regarding measurement properties of PROMs were extracted from the included studies. Each study was critically assessed for methodological quality and each PROM was evaluated for sufficient measurement properties.RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 15 studies, covering 11 different PROMs. The Carolinas Comfort Scale was the most frequently investigated PROM, being covered in five of the included publications. The included PROMs were evaluated according to nine different measurement properties, of which internal consistency and construct validity were the most frequently assessed. Evidence regarding content validity and structural validity was universally inadequate, according to the criteria for good measurement properties, as defined by the COSMIN.CONCLUSION: Based on the current evidence, it is not possible to formulate recommendations for application of PROMs for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Further validation of the included PROMs is necessary especially regarding content validity and structural validity.

KW - COSMIN

KW - Inguinal hernia

KW - Patient-reported outcome

KW - PROM

KW - Questionnaire

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083996867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa019

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa019

M3 - Review

C2 - 32211859

VL - 32

SP - 223

EP - 230

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 60988236