Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Patient-controlled hospital admission for patients with severe mental disorders: a nationwide prospective multicentre study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Brugerstyrede senge

    Projekt: Typer af projekter

  1. Trajectory of cognitive functions in bipolar disorder: for better or worse?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Incidence of suicidal behaviour and violent crime following antidepressant medication: a Danish cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Response to comment on Osler et al: misinterpretation of pre- and post differences invalidate the authors' conclusion

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  4. Societal costs of Borderline Personality Disorders: a matched-controlled nationwide study of patients and spouses

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Meta-analysis of antidepressant effects of anti-inflammatory drugs-reply

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  1. A phenome-wide association and Mendelian Randomisation study of polygenic risk for depression in UK Biobank

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Effectiveness of cognitive remediation in the ultra-high risk state for psychosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  3. The Duffy-null genotype and risk of infection

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Detection of illness worry in the general population: A specific item on illness rumination improves the Whiteley Index

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether implementing patient-controlled admission (PCA) can reduce coercion and improve other clinical outcomes for psychiatric in-patients.

METHODS: During 2013-2016, 422 patients in the PCA group were propensity score matched 1:5 with a control group (n = 2110) that received treatment as usual (TAU). Patients were followed up for at least one year using the intention to treat principle utilising nationwide registers. In a paired design, the outcomes of PCA patients during the year after signing a contract were compared with the year before.

RESULTS: No reduction in coercion (risk difference = 0.001; 95% CI: -0.038; 0.040) or self-harming behaviour (risk difference = 0.005; 95% CI: -0.008; 0.018) was observed in the PCA group compared with the TAU group. The PCA group had more in-patient bed days (mean difference = 28.4; 95% CI: 21.3; 35.5) and more medication use (P < 0.0001) than the TAU group. Before and after analyses showed reduction in coercion (P = 0.0001) and in-patient bed days (P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION: Implementing PCA did not reduce coercion, service use or self-harm behaviour when compared with TAU. Beneficial effects of PCA were observed only in the before and after PCA comparisons. Further research should investigate whether PCA affects other outcomes to better establish its clinical value.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Vol/bind137
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)355-363
Antal sider9
ISSN0001-690X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2018

ID: 56482479