Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Patient-and observer-reported long-term scar quality of wide local excision scars in melanoma patients

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. A core undergraduate curriculum in plastic surgery - a Delphi consensus study in Scandinavia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. A Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 1. Planning and management

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 6. Dental arch relationships in 5 year-olds

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Real-World Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk of Merkel cell carcinoma and malignant adnexal skin tumors: A nationwide case-control study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Metastasering af modermærkekræft efter latenstid på over 30 år

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Spontan regression af nerveskade forårsaget af kirurgi

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Wide local excision of the primary tumour is the mainstay of treatment for melanoma patients. The aims of this study were to assess the patient- and observer-reported long-term scar quality after surgery using the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) in melanoma patients, to assess the reliability and validity of POSAS, and to identify factors influencing the scar assessment. This cross-sectional clinical study included 320 melanoma patients with primary tumours on the trunk and limbs. Data regarding patients, treatment, scar characteristics and functional outcomes was analysed. Internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and convergent validity were examined. Factors influencing the patient- and observer-reported scar quality were tested using regression analyses. Results of the POSAS showed an overall good scar quality. The internal consistency of POSAS was good, and the convergent validity was strong. The inter-rater reliability was only moderate. The patients were influenced by the POSAS sub-items: colour, irregularity, thickness and pain. The observer was influenced by the POSAS sub-items: vascularity, surface area, thickness, relief and pliability. Both patient- and observer-reported scar qualities were influenced by age, location, type of superficial suture, keloids and widened scars. Moreover, the patients were influenced by the scar tightness while the observer was influenced by postoperative complications, hypertrophic scars, suture marks and dog ears. In conclusion POSAS is a reliable and valid scar assessment tool. The factors influencing patient- and observer-reported scar quality differed, and better understanding of this may improve treatment and hence patient-reported scar quality.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Sider (fra-til)1-6
Antal sider6
ISSN2000-656X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 31 okt. 2018

ID: 55578568