Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Patient experience of spinal immobilisation after trauma

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. First-response treatment after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a survey of current practices across 29 countries in Europe

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The Danish prehospital emergency healthcare system and research possibilities

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients - consensus and evidence based

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Availability of suPAR in emergency departments may improve risk stratification: a secondary analysis of the TRIAGE III trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Cervical Spine Clearance in Trauma Patients with an Unreliable Physical Examination

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Red blood cell transfusion in surgery: an observational study of the trends in the USA from 2011 to 2016

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Abnormal routine blood tests as predictors of mortality in acutely admitted patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Neuroinflammatory markers associate with cognitive decline after major surgery: findings of an explorative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Spinal immobilisation of blunt trauma victims with potential spinal cord injury is considered standard of care. The traditional management has, however, been increasingly questioned and concerns about harm have been raised. Few studies have described the perspective of the trauma patient regarding the spinal immobilisation. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the patient experience of immobilisation after trauma.

METHODS: We prospectively screened adult trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma centre for eligibility. We included adult trauma patients who had been, and remembered being, immobilised for spinal protection with a cervical collar and a spine board prehospitally or upon arrival at the trauma centre. A semi-structured interview was conducted 2 to 72 h after admission either in person or by telephone.

RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients were eligible for inclusion based on the patient charts. Out of 98 patients assessed for participation, 48 (49%) had no memory of being immobilised. We thus included 50 patients with a median age of 37 years (IQR: 26-60) of whom 38 (76%) were men. The median injury severity score was 9 (IQR: 3-15) and the median time with a cervical collar from initial application to in-hospital removal or until the interview was given was 91 min (IQR: 72-136). Nineteen patients (38%) reported discomfort and 12 patients (24%) experienced pain related to the immobilisation. Forty patients (80%) reported a sense of protection related to the immobilisation.

CONCLUSION: Discomfort related to spinal immobilisation was reported in 38% of trauma patients. However, a sense of protection was a recurring theme in 80% of the trauma patients, who recalled being immobilised. Nearly half of the awake trauma patients had no memory of being immobilised.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Vol/bind27
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)70
ISSN1757-7241
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 22 jul. 2019

ID: 57710733