Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Overview of the current status of familial hypercholesterolaemia care in over 60 countries - The EAS Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Studies Collaboration (FHSC)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Apolipoprotein M and its impact on endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in the cardiovascular system

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Associations between body mass index trajectories in childhood and cardiovascular risk factors in adulthood

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Omega-3 fatty acids and risk of cardiovascular disease in Inuit: First prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. HIV infection is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  2. Common variants in Alzheimer's disease and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • The EAS Familial Hypercholeserolaemia Studies Collaboration (FHSC)
Vis graf over relationer

Background and aims: Management of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) may vary across different settings due to factors related to population characteristics, practice, resources and/or policies. We conducted a survey among the worldwide network of EAS FHSC Lead Investigators to provide an overview of FH status in different countries. Methods: Lead Investigators from countries formally involved in the EAS FHSC by mid-May 2018 were invited to provide a brief report on FH status in their countries, including available information, programmes, initiatives, and management. Results: 63 countries provided reports. Data on FH prevalence are lacking in most countries. Where available, data tend to align with recent estimates, suggesting a higher frequency than that traditionally considered. Low rates of FH detection are reported across all regions. National registries and education programmes to improve FH awareness/knowledge are a recognised priority, but funding is often lacking. In most countries, diagnosis primarily relies on the Dutch Lipid Clinics Network criteria. Although available in many countries, genetic testing is not widely implemented (frequent cost issues). There are only a few national official government programmes for FH. Under-treatment is an issue. FH therapy is not universally reimbursed. PCSK9-inhibitors are available in ∼2/3 countries. Lipoprotein-apheresis is offered in ∼60% countries, although access is limited. Conclusions: FH is a recognised public health concern. Management varies widely across countries, with overall suboptimal identification and under-treatment. Efforts and initiatives to improve FH knowledge and management are underway, including development of national registries, but support, particularly from health authorities, and better funding are greatly needed.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAtherosclerosis
Vol/bind277
Sider (fra-til)234-255
Antal sider22
ISSN0021-9150
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 10 okt. 2018

ID: 55676612