Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation among alternatives for fertility preservation in the Nordic countries - compilation of 20 years of multicenter experience

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Human papilloma virus vaccination and its real-life efficacy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Current use of noninvasive prenatal testing in Europe, Australia and the USA: A graphical presentation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Implementation of exome sequencing in fetal diagnostics - data and experiences from a tertiary center in Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. "It's probably nothing, but…" Couples' experiences of pregnancy following an uncertain prenatal genetic result

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Non-invasive prenatal testing and maternal obesity - A review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Expression of the Insulin-like Growth Factor System in First- and Second-Trimester Human Embryonic and Fetal Gonads

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Futures and fears in the freezer: Danish women's experiences with ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Shortcomings of an unphysiological triggering of oocyte maturation using human chorionic gonadotropin

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. Surrogate testes: Allogeneic spermatogonial stem cell transplantation within an encapsulation device may restore male fertility

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Effect of sphingosine-1-phosphate on activation of dormant follicles in murine and human ovarian tissue

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
  • Tom Tanbo
  • Helena Tinkanen
  • Ann Thurin-Kjellberg
  • Elizabeth Nedstrand
  • Margareta Laczna Kitlinski
  • Kirsten T Macklon
  • Erik Ernst
  • Jens Fedder
  • Aila Tiitinen
  • Laure Morin-Papunen
  • Snorri Einarsson
  • Varpu Jokimaa
  • Maritta Hippeläinen
  • Mikael Lood
  • Johannes Gudmundsson
  • Jan I Olofsson
  • Claus Yding Andersen
Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to report the current status of ovarian tissue cryopreservation among alternatives for fertility preservation in the Nordic countries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 14 Nordic academic reproductive centers with established fertility preservation programs. It covered fertility preservation cases performed up to December 2014, standard procedures for ovarian tissue cryopreservation and oocyte cryopreservation and reproductive outcomes following ovarian tissue transplantation.

RESULTS: Among the Nordic countries, Denmark and Norway practice ovarian tissue cryopreservation as a clinical treatment (822 and 164 cases, respectively) and their programs are centralized. In Sweden (457 cases), ovarian tissue cryopreservation is practiced at five of six centers and in Finland at all five centers (145 cases). Nearly all considered ovarian tissue cryopreservation to be experimental. In Iceland, embryo cryopreservation is the only option for fertility preservation. Most centers use slow-freezing methods for ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Most patients selected for ovarian tissue cryopreservation were newly diagnosed with cancer and the tissue was predominantly retrieved laparoscopically by unilateral oophorectomy. Only minor complications were reported. In total, 46 women have undergone ovarian tissue transplantation aiming at recovering fertility, 17 healthy children have been born and several additional pregnancies are currently ongoing. Whenever patients' clinical condition is permissive, oocyte cryopreservation after hormonal stimulation is preferred for fertility preservation. Between 2012 and 2014, a smaller proportion of females have undergone fertility preservation in the Nordic centers, in comparison to males (1:3).

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, ovarian tissue cryopreservation was reported to be safe. Slow freezing methods are still preferred. Promising results of recovery of fertility have been reported in Nordic countries that have initiated ovarian tissue transplantation procedures.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind95
Udgave nummer9
Sider (fra-til)1015-26
Antal sider12
ISSN0001-6349
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2016

ID: 48420006