Ovarian removal and subsequent breast cancer prognosis: a nationwide cohort study

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether previous ovarian removal concomitant with benign hysterectomy improves prognosis in a cohort of women with breast cancer.

METHODS: In this nationwide register-based cohort study, risk of recurrence and mortality were examined in 4563 women with invasive breast cancer and previous bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) concomitant with benign hysterectomy, during 1977-2018. Comparing with benign hysterectomy alone, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated by Cox-proportional hazards regression models. Analyses were stratified on age at hysterectomy as a proxy for menopausal status (< 45, 45-54 and ≥ 55 years); tumor characteristics, estrogen receptor (ER)-status, and use of hormone therapy (HT) were included in multivariable models.

RESULTS: Compared with hysterectomy alone, premenopausal (< 45 years) BSO at benign hysterectomy was associated with an age and calendar period adjusted HR of 1.48 (95% CI 0.83-2.65) for breast cancer recurrence within 10 years of follow-up, a HR of 1.07 (95% CI 0.66-1.72) for overall mortality after breast cancer, and a HR of 0.59 (95% CI 0.26-1.32) for breast cancer-specific mortality. The corresponding HRs for postmenopausal (≥ 55 years) BSO at benign hysterectomy were 1.51 (95% CI 0.73-3.12) for recurrences, 1.34 (95% CI 0.74-2.44) for overall mortality, and 1.78 (95% CI 0.74-4.30) for breast cancer mortality. Adjusting for tumor characteristics, ER-status and HT did not alter the results.

CONCLUSION: Results from this cohort study did not indicate an improvement in breast cancer prognosis when removing the ovaries at benign hysterectomy prior to the cancer diagnosis.